Paper · 2005 · Weed Technology

Responses of Dry Beans to Flumioxazin

Nader Soltani; Stephen Bowley; Peter H. Sikkema

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
30
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

There is little information on the sensitivity of dry beans to flumioxazin. Tolerance of eight cultivars of dry beans representing four market classes (black, cranberry, kidney, and white beans) to preplant incorporated (PPI) and preemergence (PRE) applications of flumioxazin at the rate of 52.5, 70, and 140 g ai/ha were studied in three field experiments in Ontario in 2002 and 2003. There were no differences (P < 0.05) between two cultivars within a market class in their responses to flumioxazin. However, the four market classes differed in their responses to flumioxazin. Black and white beans were more sensitive to the PRE application of flumioxazin than cranberry and kidney beans. Flumioxazin applied PRE at 140 g/ha caused as much as 34% visual injury and reduced plant height by 23 to 28%, shoot dry weight by 35 to 39%, and yield by 20 to 30% in black and white bean market classes. Flumioxazin-applied PPI did not injure any market class. On the basis of this research, there is an acceptable margin of crop safety in these black and white bean cultivars only when flumioxazin is applied PPI. The two cranberry and kidney bean cultivars were tolerant to all rates of flumioxazin applied both PPI and PRE.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivars within the same dry-bean market class did not differ in flumioxazin response.

Taxon
Dry Beanst0
Material
two cultivars within a market classe0
Outcome
responses to flumioxazine0
Direction
no differencese0

Verbatim

t0

“Dry Beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–22 · show in text ↑
e0

“There were no differences (P < 0.05) between two cultivars within a market class in their responses to flumioxazin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–501 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The four dry-bean market classes differed in flumioxazin response.

Taxon
Dry Beanst0
Material
four market classese0
Outcome
responses to flumioxazine0
Direction
differede0

Verbatim

t0

“Dry Beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–22 · show in text ↑
e0

“the four market classes differed in their responses to flumioxazin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–578 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Black beans were more sensitive to preemergence flumioxazin than cranberry and kidney beans.

Taxon
Dry Beanst0
Material
Blacke0
Treatment
PRE application of flumioxazine0
Outcome
sensitivee0
Direction
more sensitivee0
Comparator
cranberry and kidney beanse0

Verbatim

t0

“Dry Beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–22 · show in text ↑
e0

“Black and white beans were more sensitive to the PRE application of flumioxazin than cranberry and kidney beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–691 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

white beans were more sensitive to preemergence flumioxazin than cranberry and kidney beans.

Taxon
Dry Beanst0
Material
whitee0
Treatment
PRE application of flumioxazine0
Outcome
sensitivee0
Direction
more sensitivee0
Comparator
cranberry and kidney beanse0

Verbatim

t0

“Dry Beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–22 · show in text ↑
e0

“Black and white beans were more sensitive to the PRE application of flumioxazin than cranberry and kidney beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–691 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PRE flumioxazin at 140 g/ha caused visual injury in black and white beans by 34%.

Taxon
Dry Beanst0
Material
black and white bean market classese0
Treatment
Flumioxazin applied PRE at 140 g/hae0
Outcome
visual injurye0
Direction
causede0
Value
34%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Dry Beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–22 · show in text ↑
e0

“Flumioxazin applied PRE at 140 g/ha caused as much as 34% visual injury and reduced plant height by 23 to 28%, shoot dry weight by 35 to 39%, and yield by 20 to 30% in black and white bean market classes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–896 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PRE flumioxazin at 140 g/ha reduced plant height in black and white beans by 23 to 28%.

Taxon
Dry Beanst0
Material
black and white bean market classese0
Treatment
Flumioxazin applied PRE at 140 g/hae0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
reducede0
Value
23 to 28%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Dry Beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–22 · show in text ↑
e0

“Flumioxazin applied PRE at 140 g/ha caused as much as 34% visual injury and reduced plant height by 23 to 28%, shoot dry weight by 35 to 39%, and yield by 20 to 30% in black and white bean market classes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–896 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PRE flumioxazin at 140 g/ha reduced shoot dry weight in black and white beans by 35 to 39%.

Taxon
Dry Beanst0
Material
black and white bean market classese0
Treatment
Flumioxazin applied PRE at 140 g/hae0
Outcome
shoot dry weighte0
Direction
reducede0
Value
35 to 39%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Dry Beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–22 · show in text ↑
e0

“Flumioxazin applied PRE at 140 g/ha caused as much as 34% visual injury and reduced plant height by 23 to 28%, shoot dry weight by 35 to 39%, and yield by 20 to 30% in black and white bean market classes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–896 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PRE flumioxazin at 140 g/ha reduced yield in black and white beans by 20 to 30%.

Taxon
Dry Beanst0
Material
black and white bean market classese0
Treatment
Flumioxazin applied PRE at 140 g/hae0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
20 to 30%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Dry Beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–22 · show in text ↑
e0

“Flumioxazin applied PRE at 140 g/ha caused as much as 34% visual injury and reduced plant height by 23 to 28%, shoot dry weight by 35 to 39%, and yield by 20 to 30% in black and white bean market classes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–896 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PPI flumioxazin did not injure any dry-bean market class.

Taxon
Dry Beanst0
Treatment
Flumioxazin-applied PPIe0
Outcome
injure any market classe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Dry Beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–22 · show in text ↑
e0

“Flumioxazin-applied PPI did not injure any market class”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–953 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors found an acceptable crop-safety margin for black and white beans only with PPI flumioxazin.

Taxon
Dry Beanst0
Material
black and white bean cultivarse0
Outcome
flumioxazin is applied PPIe0

Verbatim

t0

“Dry Beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–22 · show in text ↑
e0

“there is an acceptable margin of crop safety in these black and white bean cultivars only when flumioxazin is applied PPI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1107 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cranberry and kidney bean cultivars tolerated every tested PPI and PRE flumioxazin rate.

Taxon
Dry Beanst0
Material
cranberry and kidney bean cultivarse0
Outcome
tolerant to all rates of flumioxazin applied both PPI and PREe0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Dry Beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–22 · show in text ↑
e0

“The two cranberry and kidney bean cultivars were tolerant to all rates of flumioxazin applied both PPI and PRE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1219 · show in text ↑

flumioxazin · crop injury · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

flumioxazin · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

herbicide · crop injury · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 3 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

herbicide · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 12 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

herbicide · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 42 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.