Claim · model-written summary
‘Gravesac’ showed high rooting and root development but low vegetative development.
- Material
- ‘Gravesac’e0
- Outcome
- high rates of rooting and root development, but low vegetative developmente0
VitisNot reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“‘Gravesac’, ‘101-14 Mgt’ and ‘99 R’, showing high rates of rooting and root development, but low vegetative development.”
t0“grapevine rootstocks”
Title
Alberto Fontanella Brighenti; Fábio Ribeiro de Freitas; Isadora Teixeira Coelho Malohlava; et al. Ciência e técnica vitivinícola/Ciência e técnica vitivinícola 2023. doi:10.1051/ctv/ctv202338011
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Intervention effect IBA increased rooting and development versus control.
- Intervention effect algae extract-based biostimulant increased rooting and development versus control.
- Intervention effect IBA combined with algae extract increased rooting and development versus control.
- Observation ‘IAC 572’ had the highest rooting rates and vegetative development.
- Observation ‘Freedom’ had the highest rooting rates and vegetative development.
- Observation ‘101-14 Mgt’ showed high rooting and root development but low vegetative development.
- Observation ‘99 R’ showed high rooting and root development but low vegetative development.
- Observation ‘Salt Creek’ had the lowest rooting and vegetative development.
- Observation ‘VR 043-43’ had the lowest rooting and vegetative development.
- Observation ‘110 R’ had the lowest rooting and vegetative development.