Claim · model-written summary
Same-timing comparisons between the two fungicide combinations found no significant difference in IND efficacy.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- prothioconazole + tebuconazolee0
- Outcome
- efficacy against INDe0
- Comparator
- metconazolee0
FusariumNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Differences in efficacy against IND between pairs of prothioconazole + tebuconazole and metconazole treatments applied at the same timing (CE versus PE, CA versus PA, and CL versus PL) were not statistically significant.”
t0“Fusarium Head Blight and Deoxynivalenol in Spring and Winter Wheat”
Title
Pierce A. Paul; Carl A. Bradley; Laurence V. Madden; et al. Plant Disease 2018. doi:10.1094/pdis-03-18-0466-re
Other claims from this paper (14)
- Intervention effect Every fungicide program reduced FHB index and DON versus the nontreated check.
- Intervention effect CA controlled IND by 52.2%.
- Intervention effect PA controlled IND by 51.5%.
- Intervention effect CL controlled IND by 45.9%.
- Intervention effect PL controlled IND by 41.3%.
- Intervention effect CE and PE controlled IND by less than 33%.
- Intervention effect Anthesis and postanthesis treatments reduced IND relative to preanthesis treatment by 14.9 to 29.7%.
- Intervention effect CA reduced IND by 11.7% relative to CL.
- Intervention effect PA reduced disease by 17.4% relative to PL.
- Intervention effect CA exceeded PA in DON efficacy by 7%.
- Intervention effect CL exceeded PL in DON efficacy by 12.8%.
- Observation IND efficacy was comparable between spring and winter wheat.
- Intervention effect DON efficacy was 10 to 16% greater in spring than winter wheat for applications at or after anthesis.
- Intervention effect All programs increased grain yield and test weight relative to the nontreated check.