Paper · 2012 · Acta Agrobotanica

Control of Fusarium head blight of winter wheat by artificial and natural infection using new fungicides

Olga Treikale; Irina Afanasjeva; Jelena Pugacheva

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In Latvia, climatic factors are influential in spreading of Fusarium head blight of cereals caused by Fusarium species. The most significant factor affecting the incidence of the disease in winter wheat is hightened temperature at the time of wheat anthesis. Field trials for the control of the disease in winter wheat were done in 2003-2004 using new fungicides applied at various rates by natural infection and artificial inoculation. Three species of causative agents: Fusarium avenaceum var. herbarum, F. gibbosum, F. culmorum were collected from infected seeds of wheat and used for inoculation of experimental plots at the concentration 106 conidia ml-1 (1:1:1) at the stage of full anthesis. Effective control of the disease was obtained through application of new fungicides with different active ingredient: Prosaro 250 EC (tebuconazole 125 G, prothioconazole 125 G L-1), Input 460 EC (spiroxamine 300 G, prothioconazole 160 G L-1). In conditions of artificial infection by severe attack of Fusarium spp. the application of fungicides containing tebuconazole at T3 gave significant influence on yield of winter wheat through plumpness of grains increase. High efficacy of fungicides against leaf infection with Erysiphe graminis and Drechslera tritici-repentis was also in the trial achieved. Application of fungicide containing cyproconazole and trifloxystrobin at T1 in the trial 2004 gave good control of Septoria tritici, E. graminis and D. triticirepentis.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Heightened temperature at anthesis was the most significant factor for Fusarium head blight incidence in winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
hightened temperaturee0
Interactor
Fusarium speciesFusariume1pathogen
Outcome
incidence of the diseasee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The most significant factor affecting the incidence of the disease in winter wheat is hightened temperature at the time of wheat anthesis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 120–258 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fusarium head blight of cereals caused by Fusarium species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 60–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prosaro 250 EC effectively controlled the wheat disease.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Prosaro 250 ECe0
Interactor
FusariumFusariumt0pathogen
Outcome
control of the diseasee0
Direction
Effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Effective control of the disease was obtained through application of new fungicides with different active ingredient: Prosaro 250 EC (tebuconazole 125 G, prothioconazole 125 G L-1), Input 460 EC (spiroxamine 300 G, prothioconazole 160 G L-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–941 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fusarium head blight of winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Input 460 EC effectively controlled the wheat disease.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Input 460 ECe0
Interactor
FusariumFusariumt0pathogen
Outcome
control of the diseasee0
Direction
Effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Effective control of the disease was obtained through application of new fungicides with different active ingredient: Prosaro 250 EC (tebuconazole 125 G, prothioconazole 125 G L-1), Input 460 EC (spiroxamine 300 G, prothioconazole 160 G L-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–941 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fusarium head blight of winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under severe artificial Fusarium infection, tebuconazole fungicide at T3 significantly increased wheat yield through greater grain plumpness.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
fungicides containing tebuconazole at T3e0
Interactor
Fusarium spp.Fusariume0pathogen
Outcome
yield of winter wheate0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
artificial infection by severe attacke0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In conditions of artificial infection by severe attack of Fusarium spp. the application of fungicides containing tebuconazole at T3 gave significant influence on yield of winter wheat through plumpness of grains increase.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1163 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicides controlled Erysiphe graminis leaf infection with high efficacy.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
fungicidese0
Interactor
Erysiphe graminisBlumeria graminise0pathogen
Outcome
leaf infection with Erysiphe graminise0
Direction
High efficacye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Blumeria graminis
Blumeria graminis · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High efficacy of fungicides against leaf infection with Erysiphe graminis and Drechslera tritici-repentis was also in the trial achieved.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1301 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicides controlled Drechslera tritici-repentis leaf infection with high efficacy.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
fungicidese0
Interactor
Drechslera tritici-repentisPyrenophora tritici-repentise0pathogen
Outcome
leaf infection with Erysiphe graminis and Drechslera tritici-repentise0
Direction
High efficacye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyrenophora tritici-repentis
Pyrenophora tritici-repentis · InteractorAgronom · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High efficacy of fungicides against leaf infection with Erysiphe graminis and Drechslera tritici-repentis was also in the trial achieved.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1301 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cyproconazole and trifloxystrobin at T1 controlled Septoria tritici well.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
fungicide containing cyproconazole and trifloxystrobin at T1e0
Interactor
Septoria triticiZymoseptoria triticie0pathogen
Outcome
control of Septoria triticie0
Direction
good controle0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zymoseptoria tritici
Zymoseptoria tritici · InteractorMaccheek · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of fungicide containing cyproconazole and trifloxystrobin at T1 in the trial 2004 gave good control of Septoria tritici, E. graminis and D. triticirepentis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1302–1470 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cyproconazole and trifloxystrobin at T1 controlled E. graminis well.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
fungicide containing cyproconazole and trifloxystrobin at T1e0
Interactor
E. graminisBlumeria graminise0pathogen
Outcome
control of Septoria tritici, E. graminis and D. triticirepentise0
Direction
good controle0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Blumeria graminis
Blumeria graminis · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of fungicide containing cyproconazole and trifloxystrobin at T1 in the trial 2004 gave good control of Septoria tritici, E. graminis and D. triticirepentis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1302–1470 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cyproconazole and trifloxystrobin at T1 controlled D. triticirepentis well.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
fungicide containing cyproconazole and trifloxystrobin at T1e0
Interactor
D. triticirepentise0pathogen
Outcome
control of Septoria tritici, E. graminis and D. triticirepentise0
Direction
good controle0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of fungicide containing cyproconazole and trifloxystrobin at T1 in the trial 2004 gave good control of Septoria tritici, E. graminis and D. triticirepentis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1302–1470 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–47 · show in text ↑

cyproconazole · Zymoseptoria tritici · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

tebuconazole · Fusarium · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

cyproconazole · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

trifloxystrobin · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fungicide · Fusarium · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

28 papers: 22 positive, 6 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

fungicide · Pyrenophora tritici-repentis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

fungicide · Zymoseptoria tritici · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

fungicide · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 30 positive, 6 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.