Paper · 2018 · Indian Journal of Entomology

Compatibility of insecticides with propiconazole against foliar aphid Rhopalosiphum maidis (Fitch) and yellow rust in wheat

Poonam Jasrotia; Subhash Katare

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Occurrence of foliar aphid infestation and yellow rust infection is often simultaneous in wheat growing areas of North-Western Plains Zone (NWPZ). Farmers usually apply insecticides and fungicides separately for their management. Combined application of pesticides can be practiced saving cost, time and labour. Hence, a study was conducted during 2014–15 and 2015–16 to determine efficacy of two insecticides, imidacloprid @ 100 ml/ha and thiamethoxam @ 50 ml/ha, and one fungicide, propiconazole @ 500ml/ha alone as well as in combinations using two spray volumes of 250 and 500 l against foliar aphid and strip rust. The aphid population during 2014–15 after 15 days of spraying was observed to be the least (2.5 aphids/earhead) in sole application of imidacloprid @ 100 ml/ha, while during 2015–16, the least population (1.9 aphids/earhead) was in combination treatment of propiconazole with thiamethoxam @ 50 ml/ha in 250 l of water. The strip rust severity in combination treatments was 5–10% as compared to 40–60% in control plots. Coccinellid population in combination treatments ranged from 13.0–19.6/plot as compared to 39.6–42.3/plot in control plots. The studies indicated that mixing of broad spectrum fungicide, propiconazole did not influence the efficacy of two insecticides against foliar aphid.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole imidacloprid application yielded the least aphid population in 2014–15, 2.5 aphids per earhead.

Treatment
imidacloprid @ 100 ml/hae0
Interactor
aphide0pest
Outcome
aphid populatione0
Direction
leaste0
Value
2.5 aphids/earheade0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The aphid population during 2014–15 after 15 days of spraying was observed to be the least (2.5 aphids/earhead) in sole application of imidacloprid @ 100 ml/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–779 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Propiconazole with thiamethoxam in 250 l water yielded the least aphid population in 2015–16, 1.9 per earhead.

Treatment
combination treatment of propiconazole with thiamethoxam @ 50 ml/ha in 250 l of watere0
Interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
Outcome
aphids/earheade0
Direction
leaste0
Value
1.9 aphids/earheade0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while during 2015–16, the least population (1.9 aphids/earhead) was in combination treatment of propiconazole with thiamethoxam @ 50 ml/ha in 250 l of water.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–938 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combination treatments yielded 5–10% stripe rust severity versus 40–60% in controls.

Treatment
combination treatmentse0
Outcome
strip rust severitye0
Direction
lowerinferrede0
Value
5–10%e0
Qualifier
40–60%e0
Comparator
control plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The strip rust severity in combination treatments was 5–10% as compared to 40–60% in control plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1038 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combination treatments had 13.0–19.6 coccinellids per plot versus 39.6–42.3 in controls.

Treatment
combination treatmentse0
Interactor
Coccinellide0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Coccinellid populatione0
Direction
lowerinferrede0
Value
13.0–19.6/plote0
Qualifier
39.6–42.3/plote0
Comparator
control plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Coccinellid population in combination treatments ranged from 13.0–19.6/plot as compared to 39.6–42.3/plot in control plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1162 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixing propiconazole did not alter the two insecticides’ efficacy against foliar aphids.

Treatment
mixing of broad spectrum fungicide, propiconazolee0
Interactor
foliar aphide0pest
Outcome
efficacy of two insecticides against foliar aphide0
Direction
did not influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mixing of broad spectrum fungicide, propiconazole did not influence the efficacy of two insecticides against foliar aphid.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1312 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–123 · show in text ↑

propiconazole · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

thiamethoxam · Aphidomorpha · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

imidacloprid · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

fungicide · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 30 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.