Claim · model-written summary
In natura samples differed from commercial samples in essential oil composition.
- Taxon
- Bauhinia forficata
Bauhinia forficatae1 - Material
- In natura samplese0
- Outcome
- different from commercial samplese0
- Comparator
- commercial samplese0
Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In natura samples showed to be different from commercial samples”
e1“Bauhinia forficata Link”
Title
Eliane Przytyk JUNG; Raphael Cruz ALVES; Werickson Fortunato de Carvalho ROCHA; et al. Food Science and Technology 2022. doi:10.1590/fst.34122
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Observation The analysis identified 116 compounds in the essential oils.
- Observation Identified compounds accounted for 72% to 96% of total essential oil content.
- Observation Essential oil yields across five samples ranged from 0.03 to 0.10%.
- Observation Sesquiterpenes and oxygenated sesquiterpenes were major essential oil components.
- Method / resource Multivariate analyses grouped the samples into three groups by essential oil chemistry.
- Observation CS3 was the most distinct commercial sample group.
- Observation Eleven compounds were shared among the essential oil samples.
- Recommendation The authors suggest shared compounds could serve as chemical markers for the species.