Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Strip-tillage gave higher two-year mean maize yield than no-tillage.

A claim from Evaluating the impact of long‐term tillage practices on crop yield, soil properties, and greenhouse gas emissions in western Nebraska · 2026

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strip-tillage gave higher two-year mean maize yield than no-tillage.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
STe0
Outcome
maize yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
10.70 Mg ha − 1e0
Qualifier
over 2 yearse0
Comparator
NTe0
Setting
western Nebraskae1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor role

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mean maize yield over 2 years was higher in ST (10.70 Mg ha − 1 ) and MP (10.65 Mg ha − 1 ) than in NT (8.45 Mg ha − 1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–832
e1

“in irrigated maize in western Nebraska”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–498

Title

Evaluating the impact of long‐term tillage practices on crop yield, soil properties, and greenhouse gas emissions in western Nebraska

Sujani De Silva; Christine Booth; Deepak Ghimire; et al. Soil Science Society of America Journal 2026. doi:10.1002/saj2.70273

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-c08c7df7c080c91ab3de00f5ecc60540a796aea8ed8b8392da625ae2ef49c82c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this claim · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

1,090 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.