Intervention effectmodel-written summary

MON 37500 at 18 to 35 g ha −1 applied preemergence or fall postemergence reduced downy brome density by 71 to 92% in 1995.

A claim from MON 37500 rate and timing affects downy brome (Bromus tectorum) control in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) · 1998

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MON 37500 at 18 to 35 g ha −1 applied preemergence or fall postemergence reduced downy brome density by 71 to 92% in 1995.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
MON 37500 at 18 to 35 g ha −1 applied preemergence or fall postemergencee1
Interactor
downy bromeBromus tectorume1weed
Outcome
downy brome densitye1
Direction
reducede1
Value
71 to 92%e1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bromus tectorum
Bromus tectorum · InteractorAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–107
e1

“MON 37500 at 18 to 35 g ha −1 applied preemergence or fall postemergence reduced downy brome density 71 to 92% in 1995”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 227–345

Title

MON 37500 rate and timing affects downy brome (Bromus tectorum) control in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum)

Patrick W. Geier; Phillip W. Stahlman; Francis E. Northam; et al. Weed Science 1998. doi:10.1017/s0043174500089554

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-c0d5fc4ec6aa6fde5e56fb0f9e0322d72e61f920f5cefd03e8fba317c11376ef · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

herbicide · Bromus tectorum · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive
See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.