Abstract
Preemergence and postemergence application of metribuzin [4-amino-6- tert -butyl-3-(methylthio)- as -triazine-5(4 H )-one] at 0.6 and 1.1 kg ai/ha controlled downy brome ( Bromus tectorum L. ♯ BROTE) in winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L. ‘McDermid’) but caused considerable injury without the use of activated carbon over the seeded row. Activated carbon applied in 5-cm bands over the seeded row at 84, 167, and 336 kg/ha protected winter wheat at Pendleton on a silt loam soil. On a sandy loam soil, only a 336 kg/ha rate provided protection from metribuzin. Metribuzin toxicity to winter wheat was more difficult to neutralize when applied preemergence. Downy brome control was not reduced by carbon applied over the wheat row. The best treatment in this study was carbon at 336 kg/ha applied preemergence over the row followed by metribuzin at 0.6 or 1.1 kg/ha postemergence. A 10-week delay between preemergence carbon banding and postemergence metribuzin protected winter wheat from chemical injury.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Preemergence and postemergence metribuzin controlled downy brome in winter wheat.
- Taxon
- winter wheat
Triticum aestivume1 - Material
- McDermide1
- Treatment
- Preemergence and postemergence application of metribuzine0
- Interactor
- downy brome
Bromus tectorume1weed - Outcome
- controlled downy bromee1
- Direction
- controllede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Preemergence and postemergence application of metribuzin”
e1“controlled downy brome ( Bromus tectorum L. ♯ BROTE) in winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L. ‘McDermid’) but caused considerable injury without the use of activated carbon over the seeded row”
Claim · model-written summary
Metribuzin applied without activated carbon over the seeded row caused considerable injury to winter wheat.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Material
- McDermide1
- Treatment
- Preemergence and postemergence application of metribuzine0
- Outcome
- injurye1
- Direction
- causede1
- Qualifier
- considerablee1
- Comparator
- without the use of activated carbon over the seeded rowe1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Preemergence and postemergence application of metribuzin”
e1“controlled downy brome ( Bromus tectorum L. ♯ BROTE) in winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L. ‘McDermid’) but caused considerable injury without the use of activated carbon over the seeded row”
Claim · model-written summary
Activated carbon banded over the seeded row at 84, 167 or 336 kg/ha protected winter wheat at Pendleton on a silt loam soil.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
- Material
- McDermide1
- Treatment
- Activated carbon applied in 5-cm bands over the seeded rowe2
- Outcome
- protected winter wheate2
- Direction
- protectede2
- Value
- 84, 167, and 336 kg/hae2
- Comparator
- without the use of activated carbon over the seeded rowe1
- Setting
- Pendleton on a silt loam soile2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“Activated carbon applied in 5-cm bands over the seeded row at 84, 167, and 336 kg/ha protected winter wheat at Pendleton on a silt loam soil”
e1“controlled downy brome ( Bromus tectorum L. ♯ BROTE) in winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L. ‘McDermid’) but caused considerable injury without the use of activated carbon over the seeded row”
Claim · model-written summary
On a sandy loam soil only the 336 kg/ha carbon rate protected winter wheat from metribuzin.
- Taxon
- Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 336 kg/ha ratee3
- Outcome
- protection from metribuzine3
- Direction
- providede3
- Setting
- sandy loam soile3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“On a sandy loam soil, only a 336 kg/ha rate provided protection from metribuzin”
t0“Winter Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Metribuzin toxicity to winter wheat was harder to neutralize when metribuzin was applied preemergence.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivume4
- Treatment
- applied preemergencee4
- Compound
- Metribuzine4
- Outcome
- Metribuzin toxicity to winter wheate4
- Direction
- more difficult to neutralizee4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“Metribuzin toxicity to winter wheat was more difficult to neutralize when applied preemergence”
Claim · model-written summary
Carbon banded over the wheat row did not reduce downy brome control by metribuzin.
- Taxon
- Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- carbon applied over the wheat rowe5
- Interactor
- Downy bromeBromus tectorume5weed
- Outcome
- Downy brome controle5
- Direction
- not reducede5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“Downy brome control was not reduced by carbon applied over the wheat row”
t0“Winter Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
A 10-week delay between preemergence carbon banding and postemergence metribuzin protected winter wheat from chemical injury.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivume6
- Treatment
- A 10-week delay between preemergence carbon banding and postemergence metribuzine6
- Outcome
- chemical injurye6
- Direction
- protectede6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e6“A 10-week delay between preemergence carbon banding and postemergence metribuzin protected winter wheat from chemical injury”
Claim · model-written summary
Carbon at 336 kg/ha applied preemergence over the row followed by postemergence metribuzin was the best treatment in the study.
- Taxon
- Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- carbon at 336 kg/ha applied preemergence over the row followed by metribuzin at 0.6 or 1.1 kg/ha postemergencee7
- Outcome
- best treatmente7
- Direction
- beste7
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e7“The best treatment in this study was carbon at 336 kg/ha applied preemergence over the row followed by metribuzin at 0.6 or 1.1 kg/ha postemergence”
t0“Winter Wheat”
The same questions in other papers
metribuzin · crop injury · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
15 papers more in this group
See all 19 papers →metribuzin · Bromus tectorum · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
herbicide · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
21 papers more in this group
See all 25 papers →herbicide · crop injury · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
48 papers more in this group
See all 52 papers →herbicide · Bromus tectorum · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
8 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.