Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The 2-day drainage irrigation treatment gave 7.8% more rice biomass than soil water suction irrigation.

A claim from Yield, water productivity and economics of rice (Oriza sativa) as influenced by transplanting dates, varieties and irrigation regimes in central Punjab · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2-day drainage irrigation treatment gave 7.8% more rice biomass than soil water suction irrigation.

Treatment
irrigation treatment of 2-days drainage periode1
Outcome
biomasse1
Direction
moree1
Value
7.8e1
Comparator
soil water suction treatmente1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In the irrigation treatment of 2-days drainage period number of tillers/m2, biomass, harvest index and yield were 1.0, 7.8, 5.6 and 10.0% respectively more than that in soil water suction treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1166
t0

“rice (Oriza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–62

Title

Yield, water productivity and economics of rice (Oriza sativa) as influenced by transplanting dates, varieties and irrigation regimes in central Punjab

BHARAT BHUSHAN VASHISHT; S.K. JALOTA; KRISHAN KUMAR VASHIST Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v60i1.4415

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-c0d83cec62d7f0eea5c98dbe951e840abac8f5e75ea3f36821c2a98152ec5623 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

irrigation · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

291 papers: 222 positive, 69 negative or no effect

221 papers in the same direction as this claim · 62 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

282 papers more in this group

See all 291 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.