Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Hand weeding with pendimethalin significantly increased groundnut pod yield, by 31.2 percent over unweeded control and 7.9 percent over recommended alachlor.

A claim from Control of hardy weeds in maize (Zea mays L.) and groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) at the farmers fields · 2007

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding with pendimethalin significantly increased groundnut pod yield, by 31.2 percent over unweeded control and 7.9 percent over recommended alachlor.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
pendimethalin 0.75 kge0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
pod yield of groundnute0
Direction
increasede0
Value
31.2 per cente0
Qualifier
7.9 per cente0
Comparator
unweeded control treatmentse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similarly, integration of hand weeding with trifluralin 0.75 kg and pendimethalin 0.75 kg significantly reduced dry matter accumulation by weeds and significantly increased pod yield of groundnut as compared to the recommended treatments i.e. fluchloralin and alachlor and both these treatments increased pod yield of groundnut by 32.5 and 31.2 per cent, respectively, over unweeded control treatments and 9.1 & 7.9 per cent over the recommended treatment i.e. alachlor 2.5 kg ha−1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–1298

Title

Control of hardy weeds in maize (Zea mays L.) and groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) at the farmers fields

Surjit Singh; U. S. Walia; Buta Singh; et al. Journal of research 2007

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-c13b2dcae622bd2f7d8914c85cd62edf942349fea3c11d84508cdb606d51c9b8 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

pendimethalin · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

62 papers: 60 positive, 2 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

53 papers more in this group

See all 62 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.