Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The combination of both Trichoderma species reduced stem rot by 57.2% compared with the individual Trichoderma applications.

A claim from Activation of defense response in common bean against stem rot disease triggered byTrichoderma erinaceumandTrichoderma viride · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of both Trichoderma species reduced stem rot by 57.2% compared with the individual Trichoderma applications.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
combination of both the Trichoderma spp.e2
Outcome
stem rote2
Direction
reducinge2
Value
57.2%e2
Comparator
individual Trichoderma applicationse2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“White mold and stem rot is a common disease of Phaseolus vulgaris caused by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–100
e2

“the combination of both the Trichoderma spp. was found to be more effective in reducing stem rot by 57.2% and increasing the survival of plants by 87.5% when compared to the individual Trichoderma applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–805

Title

Activation of defense response in common bean against stem rot disease triggered byTrichoderma erinaceumandTrichoderma viride

Sunil Kumar; Vaishali Shukla; Manish Kumar Dubey; et al. Journal of Basic Microbiology 2021. doi:10.1002/jobm.202000749

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-c15029ff32bf9254c6a2f5d84463c4f3396c7012c9235b59f8057570d255ea6e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

Trichoderma · disease · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.