Claim · model-written summary
Pot studies required fewer inputs than field studies.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorDirectionValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“yet less inputs were made in the pot study”
e1“compare the growth and fruit yield of yellow passion fruit in the field and container”
Title
Okorie Okoro Ndukwe; Paul Kayode Baiyeri Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems 2020. doi:10.56369/tsaes.2675
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Association KPF-4 flowered and dropped fruit earlier than the Conventional genotype in both field and pot.
- Association Vine girth and number of branches did not differ between passion fruit genotypes in field or container.
- Association Most fruit yield traits did not differ between the genotypes in field or pot experiments.
- Association Fruit length and circumference differed between passion fruit genotypes in field or pot experiments.
- Intervention effect Poultry manure reduced days to first flowering of passion fruit compared with vines receiving no manure.
- Intervention effect Poultry manure enhanced growth characteristics of passion fruit vines compared with vines receiving no manure.
- Intervention effect Increasing poultry manure rate increased the number of fruits picked per passion fruit plant.
- Intervention effect Net return and return per naira invested increased with poultry manure rate, peaking at 20 t/ha.
- Association Phenology, growth and fruit yield of the two genotypes responded similarly to poultry manure rates in pot and field studies.
- Recommendation Pot studies could be used for preliminary evaluation of crops and prediction of field performance.