Paper · 2020 · Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems

AGRONOMIC EVALUATION OF TWO PASSION FRUIT GENOTYPES IN CONTAINERS (MEGA-POT) PREDICTED CORRESPONDING PERFORMANCES UNDER FIELD CONDITIONS

Okorie Okoro Ndukwe; Paul Kayode Baiyeri

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Background. The evaluation of crop variety in the field involves large expanse of land and could be expensive but container evaluation of crops is thought to complement field evaluation. Objective. To compare the growth and fruit yield of yellow passion fruit in the field and container (mega-pots) as influenced by varying rates of poultry manure with the hypothesis that vines grown in containers could predict the performance of the crop in the field. Methodology. Two yellow passion fruit genotypes (KPF-4 and ‘Conventional’) received varying rates of poultry manure (0, 10, 20, 30, 40 t/ha) in both the field and containers. These were laid out as split plot in randomized complete block design and completely randomized design, replicated four and ten times, respectively in the field and pots. Results. In both field and pot, days to first flowering and fruit dropping were earlier in KPF-4 than ‘Conventional’. Vine girth and number of branches were not significant different (p>0.05) between the genotypes in both field and container. Most of the fruit yield traits obtained from either field or pot experiment did not statistically vary between the genotypes except fruit length and circumference. The application of poultry manure (PM) reduced the days to first flowering but enhanced the growth characteristics of the vines compared to vines that received no manure. Increase in PM rate increased the number of fruits picked per plant. The economic analysis of both studies indicated that net return and return per naira invested increased with increase in PM rates with the peak at 20 t/ha PM application. Implications. Pot studies could be utilized for preliminary evaluation of crops and prediction of field performances. Conclusion. The study revealed that phenology, growth and fruit yield of the two genotypes had relatively similar responses to PM rates in both pot and field studies, yet less inputs were made in the pot study.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KPF-4 flowered and dropped fruit earlier than the Conventional genotype in both field and pot.

Taxon
yellow passion fruite1
Material
KPF-4e0
Outcome
days to first flowering and fruit droppinge0
Direction
earliere0
Comparator
Conventionale0
Setting
field and pote0

Verbatim

e0

“In both field and pot, days to first flowering and fruit dropping were earlier in KPF-4 than ‘Conventional’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–917 · show in text ↑
e1

“compare the growth and fruit yield of yellow passion fruit in the field and container”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–286 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vine girth and number of branches did not differ between passion fruit genotypes in field or container.

Taxon
yellow passion fruite1
Outcome
Vine girth and number of branchese0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0
Setting
field and containere0

Verbatim

e0

“Vine girth and number of branches were not significant different (p>0.05) between the genotypes in both field and container”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–1042 · show in text ↑
e1

“compare the growth and fruit yield of yellow passion fruit in the field and container”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–286 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Most fruit yield traits did not differ between the genotypes in field or pot experiments.

Taxon
yellow passion fruite1
Outcome
fruit yield traitse0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0
Setting
field or pot experimente0

Verbatim

e0

“Most of the fruit yield traits obtained from either field or pot experiment did not statistically vary between the genotypes except fruit length and circumference”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1206 · show in text ↑
e1

“compare the growth and fruit yield of yellow passion fruit in the field and container”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–286 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit length and circumference differed between passion fruit genotypes in field or pot experiments.

Taxon
yellow passion fruite1
Outcome
fruit length and circumferencee0
Setting
field or pot experimente0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Most of the fruit yield traits obtained from either field or pot experiment did not statistically vary between the genotypes except fruit length and circumference”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1206 · show in text ↑
e1

“compare the growth and fruit yield of yellow passion fruit in the field and container”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–286 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poultry manure reduced days to first flowering of passion fruit compared with vines receiving no manure.

Taxon
yellow passion fruite1
Treatment
poultry manuree0
Outcome
days to first floweringe0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
vines that received no manuree0

Verbatim

e0

“The application of poultry manure (PM) reduced the days to first flowering but enhanced the growth characteristics of the vines compared to vines that received no manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1377 · show in text ↑
e1

“compare the growth and fruit yield of yellow passion fruit in the field and container”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–286 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poultry manure enhanced growth characteristics of passion fruit vines compared with vines receiving no manure.

Taxon
yellow passion fruite1
Treatment
poultry manuree0
Outcome
growth characteristics of the vinese0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
vines that received no manuree0

Verbatim

e0

“The application of poultry manure (PM) reduced the days to first flowering but enhanced the growth characteristics of the vines compared to vines that received no manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1377 · show in text ↑
e1

“compare the growth and fruit yield of yellow passion fruit in the field and container”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–286 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing poultry manure rate increased the number of fruits picked per passion fruit plant.

Taxon
yellow passion fruite1
Treatment
PM ratee0
Outcome
number of fruits picked per plante0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Increase in PM rate increased the number of fruits picked per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1446 · show in text ↑
e1

“compare the growth and fruit yield of yellow passion fruit in the field and container”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–286 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net return and return per naira invested increased with poultry manure rate, peaking at 20 t/ha.

Taxon
yellow passion fruite1
Treatment
PM ratese0
Outcome
net return and return per naira investede0
Direction
increasede0
Value
20 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The economic analysis of both studies indicated that net return and return per naira invested increased with increase in PM rates with the peak at 20 t/ha PM application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1448–1617 · show in text ↑
e1

“compare the growth and fruit yield of yellow passion fruit in the field and container”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–286 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phenology, growth and fruit yield of the two genotypes responded similarly to poultry manure rates in pot and field studies.

Taxon
yellow passion fruite1
Treatment
PM ratese0
Outcome
phenology, growth and fruit yielde0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0
Setting
pot and field studiese0

Verbatim

e0

“The study revealed that phenology, growth and fruit yield of the two genotypes had relatively similar responses to PM rates in both pot and field studies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1749–1902 · show in text ↑
e1

“compare the growth and fruit yield of yellow passion fruit in the field and container”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–286 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pot studies required fewer inputs than field studies.

Taxon
yellow passion fruite1
Outcome
less inputse0
Setting
pot studye0

Verbatim

e0

“yet less inputs were made in the pot study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1904–1946 · show in text ↑
e1

“compare the growth and fruit yield of yellow passion fruit in the field and container”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–286 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Pot studies could be used for preliminary evaluation of crops and prediction of field performance.

Taxon
yellow passion fruite1
Outcome
preliminary evaluation of crops and prediction of field performancese0

Verbatim

e0

“Pot studies could be utilized for preliminary evaluation of crops and prediction of field performances”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1633–1735 · show in text ↑
e1

“compare the growth and fruit yield of yellow passion fruit in the field and container”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–286 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Passiflora edulis (passion fruit)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

fertilization · growth · Passiflora edulis (passion fruit)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 19 positive, 2 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.