Claim · model-written summary
Control levels with these applications remained below levels considered acceptable for Palmer amaranth.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Verbatim
t0“Palmer Amaranth ( Amaranthus palmeri )”
e0“control levels were still below those typically considered acceptable for effective Palmer amaranth contol”
Title
Colton Fuller; Thomas Mueller; Lawrence E. Steckel Weed Technology 2026. doi:10.1017/wet.2026.10115
Other claims from this paper (3)
- Intervention effect In populations with high auxinic resistance, split-boom application of 2,4-D and glufosinate was more effective than the conventional tank-mix application against Palmer amaranth.
- Recommendation Sequential split-boom applications were required to reach acceptable control in the highly resistant populations.
- Intervention effect Carrier volume (140 versus 280 L ha -1) did not significantly affect Palmer amaranth control.