Claim · model-written summary
Carrier volume (140 versus 280 L ha -1) did not significantly affect Palmer amaranth control.
- Taxon
- Palmer amaranthe0
- Treatment
- carrier volumee0
- Outcome
- Palmer amaranth controle0
- Direction
- did not significantly affecte0
- Qualifier
- 140 L ha -1 and 280 L ha -1e1
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue
Verbatim
e0“carrier volume did not significantly affect Palmer amaranth control at these volumes”
e1“mixtures of 140 L ha -1 and 280 L ha -1”
Title
Colton Fuller; Thomas Mueller; Lawrence E. Steckel Weed Technology 2026. doi:10.1017/wet.2026.10115
Other claims from this paper (3)
- Intervention effect In populations with high auxinic resistance, split-boom application of 2,4-D and glufosinate was more effective than the conventional tank-mix application against Palmer amaranth.
- Observation Control levels with these applications remained below levels considered acceptable for Palmer amaranth.
- Recommendation Sequential split-boom applications were required to reach acceptable control in the highly resistant populations.