Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The three input combination increased biological yield by 40.2% in 2011 versus control.

A claim from Studies on the response of lentil crop to integrated nutrientmanagement practices at Agra (Western U. P.) · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The three input combination increased biological yield by 40.2% in 2011 versus control.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
FYM+biofertilizer+chemical fertilizere0
Outcome
biological yielde0
Direction
maximum increasee0
Value
40.2%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combination of FYM+biofertilizer+chemical fertilizer showed maximum increase in grain yield (50.5 and 80.5%) and biological yield (34.9 and 40.2%), respectively, over the control in both the years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–804
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33

Title

Studies on the response of lentil crop to integrated nutrientmanagement practices at Agra (Western U. P.)

Pooja Dhuppar; Subhash C. Biyan; Basanti Chintapalli; et al. Crop Research 2013

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-c38440ba5968e6ee9b97826d55fdd36a70e9bcc6d42a856dfc3de77a8d0f0339 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

inoculation · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ

69 papers: 65 positive, 4 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

60 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

fertilization · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ

99 papers: 86 positive, 13 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this claim · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

90 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.