Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Medium application promoted growth more than seed treatment.

A claim from Survival and colonization of rhizobacteria in a tomato transplant system · 2003

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium application promoted growth more than seed treatment.

Treatment
application in the soilless mediume0
Outcome
growth promotione0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
seed treatmente2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the level of growth promotion was significantly greater with application in the soilless medium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1630–1726
t0

“tomato transplant system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–72
e2

“both to the medium and as seed treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1588–1628

Title

Survival and colonization of rhizobacteria in a tomato transplant system

Zhinong Yan; M S Reddy; Joseph W Kloepper Canadian Journal of Microbiology 2003. doi:10.1139/w03-051

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-c540a0c040d7a2cd527c03af4df224d5e39720045e1a93202d79415c3ae5d71b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

in vitro · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

123 papers: 93 positive, 30 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this claim · 25 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

114 papers more in this group

See all 123 papers →

growing medium · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

169 papers: 126 positive, 43 negative or no effect

125 papers in the same direction as this claim · 33 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

160 papers more in this group

See all 169 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.