Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommended replacement 1:2 intercropping for sustainable agriculture.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“This treatment, therefore, can be recommended to be the best intercropping pattern for sustainable agriculture”
t0“POTATO AND PINTO BEAN”
Title
EVALUTION OF POTATO AND PINTO BEAN INTERCROPPING
A Nasrollah Zadeh Asl; A Dabagh Mohammadinasab; سعید زهتاب سلماسی; et al. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology 2012
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Intervention effect Replacement intercropping maximized potato tuber yield per plant, area yield, and tuber size.
- Intervention effect Replacement intercropping maximized potato mean tuber weight and leaves and branches per plant.
- Intervention effect Replacement intercropping maximized pinto bean grain yield per area.
- Intervention effect Additive intercropping maximized pinto bean grain yield per plant, pods per plant, and leaves and branches.
- Intervention effect Additive intercropping maximized pinto bean height and emergence, flowering, podding and ripening dates.
- Observation Intercropping land equivalent ratios exceeded one.
- Observation Replacement 1:2 intercropping had maximum land equivalent ratios of 1.25 and 1.27 over two years.