Intervention effectmodel-written summary

BTH treatment greatly enhanced PR-gene induction in nNT-NH3 plants.

A claim from Enhanced disease resistance and hypersensitivity to BTH by introduction of an NH1/OsNPR1 paralog · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BTH treatment greatly enhanced PR-gene induction in nNT-NH3 plants.

Material
nNT-NH3 plantse0
Treatment
BTHe0
Gene
pathogenesis-related (PR) genese0
Outcome
induction of PR genese0
Direction
greatly enhancede0

Not reportedCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Expression analysis of pathogenesis-related (PR) genes showed that nNT-NH3 plants display greatly enhanced induction of PR genes only after treatment with BTH.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1380
t0

“Arabidopsis NPR1 and rice NH1 (NPR1 homolog1)/OsNPR1 in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 153–213

Title

Enhanced disease resistance and hypersensitivity to BTH by introduction of an NH1/OsNPR1 paralog

Wei Bai; Mawsheng Chern; Deling Ruan; et al. Plant Biotechnology Journal 2010. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7652.2010.00544.x

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-c799e477d4aaa08db12d084517cb93980dc1d2de76a556fbc2ce7c511c044b2e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

acibenzolar-S-methyl · molecular: expression · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.