Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Chilling in the light inhibited photosynthesis faster than chilling in the dark.

A claim from A comparative study on the effect of chilling treatment in the light and in the dark on subsequent photosynthesis in cucumber · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chilling in the light inhibited photosynthesis faster than chilling in the dark.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse2
Treatment
chilling treatment (4°C) in the lighte0
Outcome
inhibitory pacee1
Direction
fastere1
Comparator
darke0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The adverse effect of chilling treatment (4°C) in the light and dark on the subsequent photosynthesis was compared”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–114
e1

“The inhibitory pace was faster in the light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–544
e2

“using leaf discs taken from chilled cucumber ( Cucumis sativus L.) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–260

Title

A comparative study on the effect of chilling treatment in the light and in the dark on subsequent photosynthesis in cucumber

Sung-Soo Jun; Jong Min Kim; Chin Bum Lee Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 2001. doi:10.1071/pp00087

Other claims from this paper (17)

Record rev-c7b1d630d897db6e628a2598e0baa3fdbd41564a0cddf76331a06b255daca6a6 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer