Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Fertilizer did not significantly affect root yield on F100 or Kileba.

A claim from Management of African root and tuber scale using improved cassava genotypes and mineral fertilisers · 2005

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer did not significantly affect root yield on F100 or Kileba.

Treatment
Mineral fertiliser applicatione1
Outcome
root yielde0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It did not significantly affect the number of tuberous roots and root yield on either the improved F100 or on ‘Kileba'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1369–1487
t0

“Management of African root and tuber scale using improved cassava genotypes and mineral fertilisers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–99
e1

“Mineral fertiliser application significantly increased scale population density on F100, and plant height on both F100 and the local clone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1367

Title

Management of African root and tuber scale using improved cassava genotypes and mineral fertilisers

KM Lema; K Tata-Hangy; M Bidiaka African Crop Science Journal 2005. doi:10.4314/acsj.v12i3.27881

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-c7feec8a11c8fbf3b60087aa090fcbc0b9fc1bc4d7aa9de8de5ef077a719d6ba · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results

153 papers: 141 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this claim · 141 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

144 papers more in this group

See all 153 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.