Intervention effectmodel-written summary

STCR nutrient management raised gross returns to 206343 ₹/ha.

A claim from Effect of Irrigation Methods, Nutrient Management and Intercropping System on Grain Yield, Maize Equivalent Yield, Protein Content and Economics of Maize (Zea mays L.) · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

STCR nutrient management raised gross returns to 206343 ₹/ha.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Application of nutrients as par STCRe0
Outcome
gross returnse0
Direction
highere0
Value
206343 ₹/hae0
Comparator
RDF and SSNMe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of nutrients as par STCR, recorded higher grain yield (9.24 t/ha), MEY (11.15 t/ha), protein content (8.57%), gross returns (206343 ₹/ha) and net returns (134893 ₹/ha) as compared to RDF and SSNM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–991
t0

“Maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–167

Title

Effect of Irrigation Methods, Nutrient Management and Intercropping System on Grain Yield, Maize Equivalent Yield, Protein Content and Economics of Maize (Zea mays L.)

Devendra Singh; Mritunjay Kumar; Devilal Birla; et al. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science 2022. doi:10.9734/ijpss/2022/v34i232539

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-c833fadd10eefdbcd4a5eb0202e5542eae1baf37ec2a317ec5a973f36c6a2b50 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

light · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 17 positive, 31 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this claim · 30 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

39 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.