Paper · 1980 · Journal of Experimental Botany

The Effect of Light Intensity and Relative Humidity on Growth Rate and Root Respiration of Plantago lanceolata and Zea mays

H. LAMBERS; F. POSTHUMUS

12
claims
20
verbatim quotes
66
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Plants of Plantago lanceolata L. and Zea mays L., cv. ‘Campo’ were grown at two levels of light intensity. Especially in the roots, the rate of dry matter accumulation decreased at low light intensity. The carbohydrate content of both roots and shoots of P. lanceolata was not affected by light intensity. The relative contribution of SHAM1-sensitive respiration, the alternative chain, to total root respiration of both P. lanceolata and Z. mays, was not affected by light intensity during the daytime. The alternative pathway was somewhat decreased at the end of the dark period, but not in the root tips (0–5 mm) where it still contributed 56% in respiration. It was, therefore, concluded that photosynthesis is not a major factor in regulation of root growth in the species investigated. To see whether the effect of light intensity on root growth rate was via transpiration, plants of Z. mays were grown at different air humidities. Both high humidity and low light intensity affected the root morphology in such a way that the distance between the apex and the first laterals on the primary root axis increased. It is suggested that this effect on root morphology is due to transpiration and the subsequent removal of root-produced inhibitors of lateral root growth; although light intensity also affected the rate of dry matter accumulation of roots and the rate was not affected by the humidity of the air. It is, therefore, concluded that the effect of light intensity on the rate of dry matter accumulation of roots of Z. mays is not via an effect on transpiration.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low light reduced root dry matter accumulation in the two species.

Taxon
Plantago lanceolataPlantago lanceolatat0
Treatment
low light intensitye0
Outcome
rate of dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Plantago lanceolata
Plantago lanceolata · Taxonsannse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Especially in the roots, the rate of dry matter accumulation decreased at low light intensity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–201 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plantago lanceolata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low light reduced root dry matter accumulation in maize.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayst0
Treatment
low light intensitye0
Outcome
rate of dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Especially in the roots, the rate of dry matter accumulation decreased at low light intensity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–201 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zea mays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light intensity did not change root and shoot carbohydrate content in Plantago.

Taxon
P. lanceolataPlantago lanceolatae0
Treatment
light intensitye0
Outcome
carbohydrate content of both roots and shootse0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Plantago lanceolata
Plantago lanceolata · Taxonsannse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The carbohydrate content of both roots and shoots of P. lanceolata was not affected by light intensity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–305 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Daytime alternative respiration contribution was unaffected by light in Plantago.

Taxon
P. lanceolataPlantago lanceolatae0
Treatment
light intensitye0
Outcome
relative contribution of SHAM1-sensitive respiratione0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Plantago lanceolata
Plantago lanceolata · Taxonsannse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The relative contribution of SHAM1-sensitive respiration, the alternative chain, to total root respiration of both P. lanceolata and Z. mays, was not affected by light intensity during the daytime.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 306–503 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Daytime alternative respiration contribution was unaffected by light in maize.

Taxon
Z. maysZea mayse0
Treatment
light intensitye0
Outcome
relative contribution of SHAM1-sensitive respiratione0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The relative contribution of SHAM1-sensitive respiration, the alternative chain, to total root respiration of both P. lanceolata and Z. mays, was not affected by light intensity during the daytime.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 306–503 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The alternative respiratory pathway decreased somewhat at the end of darkness, except in root tips, where it contributed 56%.

Taxon
Plantago lanceolataPlantago lanceolatat0
Organ / stage
root tipse0
Outcome
alternative pathwaye0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
56%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Plantago lanceolata
Plantago lanceolata · Taxonsannse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The alternative pathway was somewhat decreased at the end of the dark period, but not in the root tips (0–5 mm) where it still contributed 56% in respiration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–662 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plantago lanceolata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High humidity increased distance from the root apex to the first laterals in maize.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayst0
Treatment
high humiditye0
Outcome
distance between the apex and the first laterals on the primary root axise0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both high humidity and low light intensity affected the root morphology in such a way that the distance between the apex and the first laterals on the primary root axis increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1117 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zea mays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low light increased distance from the root apex to the first laterals in maize.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayst0
Treatment
low light intensitye0
Outcome
distance between the apex and the first laterals on the primary root axise0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both high humidity and low light intensity affected the root morphology in such a way that the distance between the apex and the first laterals on the primary root axis increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1117 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zea mays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humidity did not affect maize root dry matter accumulation.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayst0
Treatment
humidity of the aire0
Outcome
ratee0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the rate was not affected by the humidity of the air.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1361–1414 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zea mays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–123 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that photosynthesis is not a major regulator of root growth in these species.

Taxon
Plantago lanceolataPlantago lanceolatat0
Outcome
root growthe0
Qualifier
photosynthesis is not a major factore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Plantago lanceolata
Plantago lanceolata · Taxonsannse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“photosynthesis is not a major factor in regulation of root growth in the species investigated.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–791 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plantago lanceolata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–110 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest transpiration and removal of root-produced inhibitors explain the morphology response.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayst0
Outcome
effect on root morphologye0
Qualifier
transpiration and the subsequent removal of root-produced inhibitors of lateral root growthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this effect on root morphology is due to transpiration and the subsequent removal of root-produced inhibitors of lateral root growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1271 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zea mays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–123 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that light affects maize root dry matter accumulation independently of transpiration.

Taxon
Z. maysZea mayse0
Outcome
rate of dry matter accumulation of rootse0
Qualifier
not via an effect on transpiratione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effect of light intensity on the rate of dry matter accumulation of roots of Z. mays is not via an effect on transpiration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1448–1575 · show in text ↑

light · physiology: respiration · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

light · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 17 positive, 31 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

light · yield · Plantago lanceolata (narrow-leaved plantain)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.