Paper · 1981 · Soil Science Society of America Journal

Effects of Water and Nitrogen Management on Yield and 15N‐Depleted Fertilizer Use Efficiency of Irrigated Corn

M. P. Russelle; E. J. Deibert; R. D. Hauck; et al.

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
84
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The objective of this experiment was to evaluate the effects of irrigation sequence and of time and rate of nitrogen application on the dry matter production and fertilizer use efficiency of irrigated corn ( Zea mays L.), grown on a representative fine‐textured soil of eastern Nebraska, and to monitor the movement of fertilizer N in this soil. During 1974–1976, 15 N‐depleted ammonium sulfate was banded at rates of 112, 168, or 224 kg N/ha at planting or sidedressed at the eight‐leaf growth stage. No N was applied in 1977–1979. In 1974–1977, irrigation applications of 5, 7.5, or 10 cm of water were made at 2‐, 3‐, or 4‐week intervals, respectively, until a total of 30 cm had been applied. The plots were uniformly irrigated in 1978–1979. Grain yield and N uptake in 1974–1976 were not influenced by time of N application, and were highest with light, frequent irrigation. From 1977–1978, yield increased with previous N rate in response to residual mineral N in the soil. During both treatment and residual years, fertilizer N recovery in the grain was greater with sidedressing and increased with N rate. Heavier, infrequent irrigation decreased tracer N recovery in 1974–1976. Maximum fertilizer use efficiency was obtained with the low N rate, applied as a sidedressing, and with light, frequent irrigation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield and N uptake were not influenced by the time of N application.

Treatment
time of N applicatione1
Outcome
Grain yield and N uptakee1
Direction
not influencede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Irrigated Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–110 · show in text ↑
e1

“Grain yield and N uptake in 1974–1976 were not influenced by time of N application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–837 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield and N uptake were highest with light, frequent irrigation.

Treatment
light, frequent irrigatione2
Outcome
Grain yield and N uptakee1
Direction
higheste2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Irrigated Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–110 · show in text ↑
e1

“Grain yield and N uptake in 1974–1976 were not influenced by time of N application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–837 · show in text ↑
e2

“were highest with light, frequent irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–887 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

From 1977 to 1978 yield increased with previous N rate, through residual mineral N in the soil.

Treatment
previous N ratee3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
increasede3
Qualifier
residual mineral N in the soile3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Irrigated Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–110 · show in text ↑
e3

“From 1977–1978, yield increased with previous N rate in response to residual mineral N in the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–987 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer N recovery in the grain was greater with sidedressing.

Treatment
sidedressinge4
Outcome
fertilizer N recovery in the graine4
Direction
greatere4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Irrigated Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–110 · show in text ↑
e4

“fertilizer N recovery in the grain was greater with sidedressing and increased with N rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer N recovery in the grain increased with N rate.

Treatment
N ratee4
Outcome
fertilizer N recovery in the graine4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Irrigated Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–110 · show in text ↑
e4

“fertilizer N recovery in the grain was greater with sidedressing and increased with N rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heavier, infrequent irrigation decreased tracer N recovery in 1974–1976.

Treatment
Heavier, infrequent irrigatione5
Outcome
tracer N recoverye5
Direction
decreasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Irrigated Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–110 · show in text ↑
e5

“Heavier, infrequent irrigation decreased tracer N recovery in 1974–1976”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1194 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum fertilizer use efficiency was obtained with a low N rate applied as sidedressing under light, frequent irrigation.

Treatment
low N rate, applied as a sidedressinge6
Outcome
fertilizer use efficiencye6
Direction
Maximume6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Irrigated Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–110 · show in text ↑
e6

“Maximum fertilizer use efficiency was obtained with the low N rate, applied as a sidedressing, and with light, frequent irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1326 · show in text ↑

irrigation · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 14 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

light · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 17 positive, 31 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

194 papers: 142 positive, 52 negative or no effect

141 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

190 papers more in this group

See all 194 papers →

irrigation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,016 papers: 791 positive, 225 negative or no effect

790 papers in the same direction as this paper · 209 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1,012 papers more in this group

See all 1,016 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

1,905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

2,181 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.