Intervention effectmodel-written summary

At 1,152 g ae ha⁻¹ dicamba, yield reductions reached 7% and 9% for Cultivars A and B.

A claim from Response of dicamba-resistant soybean cultivars to postemergence dicamba dose exposure · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 1,152 g ae ha⁻¹ dicamba, yield reductions reached 7% and 9% for Cultivars A and B.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Material
Cultivars A and Be2
Treatment
dicamba dose of 1,152 g ae ha⁻¹e2
Outcome
yield reductionse2
Direction
reachede2
Value
7% and 9%e2

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dicamba-resistant (DR) soybean cultivars are essential elements in managing broadleaf weeds in modern production systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–129
e2

“At a dicamba dose of 1,152 g ae ha⁻¹, yield reductions reached 7% and 9% for Cultivars A and B, respectively, while the highest rate (1,440 g ae ha⁻¹) resulted in yield reductions of 12% (Cultivar A) and 14% (Cultivar B)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1516

Title

Response of dicamba-resistant soybean cultivars to postemergence dicamba dose exposure

Willian Felipe Larini; Alfredo Junior P. Albrecht; Debora C. Neuberger; et al. Weed Technology 2025. doi:10.1017/wet.2025.10046

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-c85f2e641cb995b97668140b50e2b82342999cadabb77a4aa58b302baa817020 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

dicamba · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

49 papers: 11 positive, 38 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this claim · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

40 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.