Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Treatment F4 (25% RDF organic + 75% RDF inorganic) gave higher number of cloves, clove length and bulb diameter than other treatments.

A claim from Evaluation of Balanced Fertilizer doses on Growth, Yield and Nutrient Uptake in Garlic under Irrigated Ecosystem of Western Uttar Pradesh · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment F4 (25% RDF organic + 75% RDF inorganic) gave higher number of cloves, clove length and bulb diameter than other treatments.

Taxon
GarlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
25% RDF organic + 75% RDF inorganice1
Outcome
number of cloves, length of largest clove (cm), diameter of bulb (cm)e1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
other treatmentse1
Setting
Western Uttar Pradesht0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Nutrient Uptake in Garlic under Irrigated Ecosystem of Western Uttar Pradesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–137
e1

“treatment F4, i.e. 25% RDF organic + 75% RDF inorganic recorded higher length of roots/bulb, number of roots/plant, number of cloves, length of largest clove (cm), diameter of bulb (cm), bulb yield and nutrient uptake of NPK as compared to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–769

Title

Evaluation of Balanced Fertilizer doses on Growth, Yield and Nutrient Uptake in Garlic under Irrigated Ecosystem of Western Uttar Pradesh

Amit Kumar; Buta Singh; R.K. Naresh; et al. Annals of Horticulture 2013

Other claims from this paper (2)

Record rev-c88990440bb7ef71be0b8736414b35c7c22c137de917376cf1c2404150788f4b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

fertilization · growth · Allium sativum (garlic)Positive and negative results

99 papers: 93 positive, 6 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

90 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.