Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Rhizobium gallicum F4DC inoculation significantly increased bean pod number relative to the control.

A claim from Genetic characterization of rhizobium bacteria isolated from bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) nodules and its effect on growth · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium gallicum F4DC inoculation significantly increased bean pod number relative to the control.

Taxon
sugar bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)Phaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
inoculation with Rhizobium gallicum F4DC (MZ156852)e0
Interactor
Rhizobium gallicum F4DCRhizobium gallicume0symbiont
Outcome
number of podse0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
the controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sugar bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) inoculation with Rhizobium gallicum F4DC (MZ156852) induced a significant increase in the number of nodules, grain yield, number of pods, and plant height compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–1070

Title

Genetic characterization of rhizobium bacteria isolated from bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) nodules and its effect on growth

Dilek KAYA ÖZDOĞAN; Çağlar SAGUN; Vecihe İNCİRKUŞ; et al. Soil Studies 2023. doi:10.21657/soilst.1407937

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-c8a1dfd18a25b0dbd2104b4459d8593f7cbe47976750a3b6083326afabc55d4f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

Rhizobium gallicum · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

195 papers: 153 positive, 42 negative or no effect

152 papers in the same direction as this claim · 36 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

186 papers more in this group

See all 195 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.