Claim · model-written summary
Visual injury indicated wheat yield reduction accurately.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Outcome
- yield reductionse0
- Qualifier
- visual injurye0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat Response”
e0“Correlation analysis suggests that visual injury is an accurate indicator of yield reductions.”
Title
Wheat Response to Simulated Drift of Glyphosate and Imazamox Applied at Two Growth Stages
Zacharria A. Deeds; Kassim Al-Khatib; Dallas E. Peterson; et al. Weed Technology 2006. doi:10.1614/wt-04-273r.1
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Intervention effect Wheat injury rose with herbicide rate.
- Intervention effect Wheat yield loss rose with herbicide rate.
- Intervention effect The 1/100× rate of either herbicide had minimal effect on wheat.
- Intervention effect Both herbicides at 1/3× nearly killed wheat and eliminated yield regardless of application stage.
- Intervention effect Glyphosate generally caused greater wheat injury than imazamox.
- Intervention effect Glyphosate generally caused greater wheat yield reduction than imazamox.
- Intervention effect Herbicide application at jointing caused more injury than at flowering.
- Intervention effect Herbicide application at jointing caused more yield loss than at flowering.
- Observation Surviving herbicide-treated wheat that produced harvestable seed showed no reduction in seed viability.