Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Mineral fertilizer significantly increased grain protein at every studied seeding rate.

A claim from LENTIL CULTIVATION EFFICIENCY ON ORDINARY CHERNOZEM, DEPENDING ON THE SEEDING RATE AND MINERAL FERTILIZERS DOSES · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral fertilizer significantly increased grain protein at every studied seeding rate.

Taxon
LENTILLens culinarist0
Treatment
mineral fertilizerse0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
all studied seeding ratese0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of mineral fertilizers leads to a significant increase in the protein content at all studied seeding rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1245
t0

“LENTIL CULTIVATION EFFICIENCY ON ORDINARY CHERNOZEM, DEPENDING ON THE SEEDING RATE AND MINERAL FERTILIZERS DOSES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–112

Title

LENTIL CULTIVATION EFFICIENCY ON ORDINARY CHERNOZEM, DEPENDING ON THE SEEDING RATE AND MINERAL FERTILIZERS DOSES

A. V. Fedyushkin; S. V. Pasko Scientific Journal of Russian Scientific Research Institute of Land Improvement Problems 2021. doi:10.31774/2222-1816-2021-11-2-174-186

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-c8e48e6c3d60a3b8356133486a3b4d4318357db6f0779a3b5a3d109c8d50aeae · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

fertilization · quality: protein · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.