Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Higher bulk density under CT reduced rainfed soybean grain yield relative to NT.

A claim from Improving irrigation, crop, and soil management for sustainable soybean production in Southern Brazilian lowlands · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher bulk density under CT reduced rainfed soybean grain yield relative to NT.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
CTe0
Outcome
grain yield in rainfed soybeane0
Direction
reducese0
Qualifier
0.05-0.10 m layere0
Comparator
NTe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest soil bulk density at the 0.05-0.10 m layer in the CT reduces grain yield in rainfed soybean compared to NT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1228–1346

Title

Improving irrigation, crop, and soil management for sustainable soybean production in Southern Brazilian lowlands

Robson Giacomeli; Reimar Carlesso; Mirta Teresinha Petry; et al. Scientia Agricola 2021. doi:10.1590/1678-992x-2021-0115

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-c95de1c9784f07d711776fa797a7db61324b2a5d0aec5f9f16fc8e402b4c6ccc · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

390 papers: 264 positive, 126 negative or no effect

125 papers in the same direction as this claim · 264 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    No-tillage gave a higher economic return than conventional tillage in soybean.

    Soybean Spatiotemporal Yield and Economic Variability as Affected by Tillage and Crop Rotation · 2016 · compared with conventional tillage

    Opposite directionCited by this paper

  2. negative
    Adding ridge tillage to chiseled soil yielded 4,001 kg ha-1 and did not surpass chiseling.

    Transpiration Reduction Factor and Soybean Yield in Low Land Soil with Ridge and Chiseling · 2018

    Same directionCited by this paper

  3. positive
    No-tillage soybean yield was 6% higher than under conventional tillage.

    Corn and Soybean Response to Rotation Sequence, Row Spacing, and Tillage System · 2003 · compared with conventional tillage system

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Conservation tillage with corn-soybean rotation gave the most consistent yield increase over four years.

    Influence of Tillage and Crop Rotation on Yields of Corn, Soybean, and Wheat · 1988

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    No-tillage increased seed mass by 15% over conventional tillage.

    Response of Soybean Yield Components to Management System and Planting Date · 2004 · compared with conventional tillage system

    Opposite direction

  6. positive
    Tillage increased soybean yields.

    Long-term crop rotation and tillage effects on soil greenhouse gas emissions and crop production in Illinois, USA · 2018 · compared with no-tillage

    Opposite direction

  7. positive
    At equivalent final stands, complete-tillage yields were less than 3 bu/acre higher than reduced or no-tillage yields.

    Soybean Planting Date, Row Width, and Seeding Rate Response in Three Tillage Systems · 1992 · compared with RT or NT

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    Soybean yield was highest under no-till.

    Tillage, Crop Sequence, and Cultivar Effects on Sclerotinia Stem Rot Incidence and Yield in Soybean · 2001

    Opposite direction

381 papers more in this group

See all 390 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.