Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Hand hoed grain sorghum yield was higher under no tillage.

A claim from Double Cropping Systems Involving No‐Tillage and Conventional Tillage1 · 1973

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand hoed grain sorghum yield was higher under no tillage.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolore0
Treatment
no‐tillagee0
Outcome
yield of grain sorghume0
Direction
highere0
Value
5,072e0
Qualifier
handhoede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When the crop was handhoed yield of grain sorghum was significantly higher for no‐tillage (5,072 vs 4.335 kg/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1184

Title

Double Cropping Systems Involving No‐Tillage and Conventional Tillage1

J. O. Sanford; D. L. Myhre; Norman C. Merwine Agronomy Journal 1973. doi:10.2134/agronj1973.00021962006500060040x

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-ca01dbefe7966d9ac42aaab2476f24b10aea0e88d7b548b7ef386217b73e722d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 29 positive, 19 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this claim · 16 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Reduced tillage decreased grain sorghum yields by 15% compared with no-tillage

    Strategic Tillage Effects on Crop Yields, Soil Properties, and Weeds in Dryland No-Tillage Systems · 2021 · compared with NT

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Tillage did not affect grain yield or plant available water capacity.

    Applying nitrogen to grain sorghum in central Queensland: residual value and effect of fallowing and tillage practice · 1996

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Sorghum grain yields were generally lower under no till than conventional till when significant differences occurred.

    Long Term Effects of Tillage and Nitrogen Source, Rate, and Placement on Grain Sorghum Production · 1997 · compared with CT

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    No-till grain sorghum without N fertilizer never matched the yields of conventional disk tillage with fertilizer.

    Tillage and clover cover crop effects on grain sorghum yield and nitrogen uptake · 1990 · compared with conventional disk tillage treatments with fertilizer

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    No-till and clean-till grain sorghum had similar yields over two years.

    No-till management of furrow irrigated continuous grain sorghum · 1975 · compared with clean-till

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Tillage-stubble management did not influence yield characteristics at Clovis.

    Grain Sorghum Water Use Efficiency and Yield Are Impacted by Tillage Management Systems, Stubble Height, and Crop Rotation · 2017

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Defoliating tillers did not significantly influence main culm grain yield.

    Leaf Removal in Grain Sorghum. III. Main Culm‐Tiller Relationships1 · 1961

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Tiller removal lowered sorghum grain yield by about 20% in a wet season.

    The Field Performance of Induced Uniculm Grain Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) in South-east Queensland, Australia · 1986

    Opposite direction

39 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.