Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Treated wastewater did not adversely affect overall alfalfa forage quality.

A claim from Changes in Yield and Forage Quality of Six Alfalfa Cultivars in Response to Sustainable Irrigation with Treated Wastewater · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated wastewater did not adversely affect overall alfalfa forage quality.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
irrigation with treated wastewatere0
Outcome
forage qualitye0
Direction
did not show any adverse effectse0
Comparator
plants irrigated with normal watere1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation with treated wastewater did not show any adverse effects on forage quality of alfalfa plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1082
e1

“plants irrigated with normal water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1185

Title

Changes in Yield and Forage Quality of Six Alfalfa Cultivars in Response to Sustainable Irrigation with Treated Wastewater

Walid Soufan; Nasser Al-Suhaibani; Peter Tillmann; et al. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 2020. doi:10.17957/ijab/15.1561

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-ca2d7e3cf8fbacce50e211200e7ac0386c534d34dfbc2696b34d4f7f5ec10a28 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

irrigation · quality: grain · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 6 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. negative
  8. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.