Claim · model-written summary
Planting date did not affect matted-row yield.
- Taxon
- Strawberries
_single2.jpg?width=60)
Fragaria ×ananassat0 - Treatment
- original planting datee0
- Outcome
- matted row yieldse0
- Direction
- no effecte0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_single2.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Strawberries”
e0“original planting date had no effect on matted row yields”
Title
Training Systems for Second-year Production of Fall-planted Strawberries
J. D. Caldwell; L. W. Grimes HortScience 1987. doi:10.21273/hortsci.22.3.409
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Intervention effect Mowing did not affect matted-row yield.
- Intervention effect Matted rows generally yielded more than hill rows except for the 23 September planting.
- Intervention effect Hill rows produced larger fruit than matted rows.
- Intervention effect Matted rows had more fruit than hill rows.
- Intervention effect Matted rows had 57 % more crowns per area than hill rows.
- Intervention effect The earliest hill-row planting yielded more than later plantings.
- Association Fruit number declined as spacing increased in later plantings of both systems.
- Association Hill-row yield declined as spacing increased.
- Observation Apollo outperformed Earlibelle for yield and yield components in both systems.