Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Fertilizer materials did not differ significantly in disease suppression, growth, or production.

A claim from Microbial consortium formulation in liquid organic fertilizer for managing bacterial leaf blight (Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae), rice blast (Pyricularia oryzae), and enhancing rice productivity · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer materials did not differ significantly in disease suppression, growth, or production.

Treatment
LOF materialse0
Outcome
disease suppression, growth, and rice productione0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Comparator
LOF materialse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were no significant differences in LOF materials for disease suppression, growth, and rice production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1670–1778

Title

Microbial consortium formulation in liquid organic fertilizer for managing bacterial leaf blight (Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae), rice blast (Pyricularia oryzae), and enhancing rice productivity

SUHARTININGSIH DWI NURCAHYANTI; RACHMI MASNILAH; SUBHAN ARIF BUDIMAN; et al. Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity 2024. doi:10.13057/biodiv/d250539

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-cce7fe8955dfe736f362dbcbfdc0c9dd0fc5d963acef373020e019d841ef39c9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

fertilization · control · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
    Production efficacy was higher under 2:5:3.

    Study on Precise and Quantitative N Application Technique in Rice · 2008 · compared with other treatments

    No difference from an alternative

  8. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.