Paper · 2016 · Bhartiya Krishi Anusandhan Patrika

Integrated management of Bakanae diseasein paddy cv. Pusa Basmati 1121

Anuja Gupta; Ravindra Kumar; V.K. Maheshwari

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Bakanae disease of rice is widespread in all rice growing countries of the world and in all rice varieties especially Basmati rice varieties. Different management practices viz., seed treatments, seedling dip treatments and soil amendments were integrated for the management of Bakanae disease in Paddy variety Pusa Basmati 1121. Seed treatment with 0.2% bavistin and 0.4% Trichoderma viride (Tv) gave 22.7 and 11.4% control of the disease. However, the disease incidence did not vary much amongst different seed treatments under FYM+Tv treated soil conditions. Seed treatment with Bavistin and Tv gave 10.1 and 10.2% disease, respectively as against 10.3% in crop grown from untreated seed under FYM+Tv soil condition. Seedling dip in 0.2% bavistin or 0.4% Trichoderma viride solution before transplanting significantly reduced the disease incidence. Seedling dip treatments with bavistin and Tv solutions resulted in 55.5 and 34.5% control of the disease, respectively, irrespective of soil amendments. The diseaseincidence was 10.3 and 11.8% in FYM+Tv treated soil and Tv treated soil, respectively as against 13.6% in untreated soil. The highest disease incidence (27.3%) was recorded in non-amended soils transplanted from nursery of untreated seeds and the seedlings dipped in plain water at the time of transplanting. The disease control in FYM+Tv treated soil and Tv treated soil was statistically at par and significantly superior to untreated soil. The grain yield in plots transplanted from treated seeds and seedling dip treatments were statistically superior to the plots transplanted from untreated seeds and seedlings dipped in plain water.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bavistin seed treatment gave 22.7% disease control.

Taxon
paddyt0
Treatment
0.2% bavistine0
Outcome
control of the diseasee0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
22.7e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“paddy cv. Pusa Basmati 1121”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“Seed treatment with 0.2% bavistin and 0.4% Trichoderma viride (Tv) gave 22.7 and 11.4% control of the disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 330–439 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma viride seed treatment gave 11.4% disease control.

Taxon
paddyt0
Treatment
0.4% Trichoderma viridee0
Interactor
Trichoderma virideTrichoderma viridee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
control of the diseasee0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
11.4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichoderma viride
Trichoderma viride · InteractorKatja Schulz · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“paddy cv. Pusa Basmati 1121”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“Seed treatment with 0.2% bavistin and 0.4% Trichoderma viride (Tv) gave 22.7 and 11.4% control of the disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 330–439 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bavistin seed treatment yielded 10.1% disease under FYM and Tv soil treatment versus 10.3% for untreated seed.

Taxon
paddyt0
Treatment
Seed treatment with Bavistine0
Outcome
diseasee0
Direction
lowerinferrede0
Value
10.1e0
Qualifier
10.3%e0
Comparator
untreated seede0

Verbatim

t0

“paddy cv. Pusa Basmati 1121”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“Seed treatment with Bavistin and Tv gave 10.1 and 10.2% disease, respectively as against 10.3% in crop grown from untreated seed under FYM+Tv soil condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–718 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tv seed treatment yielded 10.2% disease under FYM and Tv soil treatment versus 10.3% for untreated seed.

Taxon
paddyt0
Treatment
Tve0
Outcome
diseasee0
Direction
lowerinferrede0
Value
10.2%e0
Qualifier
10.3%e0
Comparator
untreated seede0

Verbatim

t0

“paddy cv. Pusa Basmati 1121”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“Seed treatment with Bavistin and Tv gave 10.1 and 10.2% disease, respectively as against 10.3% in crop grown from untreated seed under FYM+Tv soil condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–718 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bavistin seedling dip significantly reduced disease incidence, giving 55.5% control.

Taxon
paddyt0
Treatment
0.2% bavistine0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
55.5e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“paddy cv. Pusa Basmati 1121”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“Seedling dip in 0.2% bavistin or 0.4% Trichoderma viride solution before transplanting significantly reduced the disease incidence. Seedling dip treatments with bavistin and Tv solutions resulted in 55.5 and 34.5% control of the disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–956 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma seedling dip significantly reduced disease incidence, giving 34.5% control.

Taxon
paddyt0
Treatment
0.4% Trichoderma viride solutione0
Interactor
Trichoderma virideTrichoderma viridee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
34.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichoderma viride
Trichoderma viride · InteractorKatja Schulz · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“paddy cv. Pusa Basmati 1121”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“Seedling dip in 0.2% bavistin or 0.4% Trichoderma viride solution before transplanting significantly reduced the disease incidence. Seedling dip treatments with bavistin and Tv solutions resulted in 55.5 and 34.5% control of the disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–956 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM and Tv soil treatment had 10.3% disease incidence versus 13.6% in untreated soil.

Taxon
paddyt0
Treatment
FYM+Tv treated soile0
Outcome
diseaseincidencee0
Direction
lowerinferrede0
Value
10.3e0
Qualifier
13.6%e0
Comparator
untreated soile0

Verbatim

t0

“paddy cv. Pusa Basmati 1121”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“The diseaseincidence was 10.3 and 11.8% in FYM+Tv treated soil and Tv treated soil, respectively as against 13.6% in untreated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tv soil treatment had 11.8% disease incidence versus 13.6% in untreated soil.

Taxon
paddyt0
Treatment
Tv treated soile0
Outcome
diseaseincidencee0
Direction
lowerinferrede0
Value
11.8%e0
Qualifier
13.6%e0
Comparator
untreated soile0

Verbatim

t0

“paddy cv. Pusa Basmati 1121”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“The diseaseincidence was 10.3 and 11.8% in FYM+Tv treated soil and Tv treated soil, respectively as against 13.6% in untreated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1136 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated seed, plain water seedling dip and unamended soil had the highest disease incidence at 27.3%.

Taxon
paddyt0
Treatment
non-amended soilse0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
27.3%e0

Verbatim

t0

“paddy cv. Pusa Basmati 1121”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest disease incidence (27.3%) was recorded in non-amended soils transplanted from nursery of untreated seeds and the seedlings dipped in plain water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1294 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease control in FYM and Tv treated soil was statistically at par with Tv treated soil.

Taxon
paddyt0
Treatment
FYM+Tv treated soile0
Outcome
disease controle0
Direction
statistically at pare0
Comparator
Tv treated soile0

Verbatim

t0

“paddy cv. Pusa Basmati 1121”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“The disease control in FYM+Tv treated soil and Tv treated soil was statistically at par and significantly superior to untreated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1457 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Both treated soils controlled disease significantly better than untreated soil.

Taxon
paddyt0
Treatment
FYM+Tv treated soil and Tv treated soile0
Outcome
disease controle0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
untreated soile0

Verbatim

t0

“paddy cv. Pusa Basmati 1121”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“The disease control in FYM+Tv treated soil and Tv treated soil was statistically at par and significantly superior to untreated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1457 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated seed and seedling dip increased grain yield significantly versus untreated seed and plain water dip.

Taxon
paddyt0
Treatment
treated seeds and seedling dip treatmentse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
untreated seeds and seedlings dipped in plain watere0

Verbatim

t0

“paddy cv. Pusa Basmati 1121”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“The grain yield in plots transplanted from treated seeds and seedling dip treatments were statistically superior to the plots transplanted from untreated seeds and seedlings dipped in plain water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1459–1654 · show in text ↑

carbendazim · control · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Trichoderma viride · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

carbendazim · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

25 papers: 25 positive, 0 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

fertilization · control · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

seed treatment · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

69 papers: 64 positive, 5 negative or no effect

63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.