Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Oxadiargyl and Pretilachlor applied pre-emergence effectively controlled weeds in wet-seeded rice in both seasons, compared with hand weeding and unweeded control.

A claim from Effect of tillage and practices and pre-emergence herbicides application for weed control in wet - seeded rice · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oxadiargyl and Pretilachlor applied pre-emergence effectively controlled weeds in wet-seeded rice in both seasons, compared with hand weeding and unweeded control.

Taxon
wet-seeded ricee1
Treatment
Oxadiargyl and Pretilachlor applicatione2
Interactor
weedse1weed
Outcome
weedse2
Direction
effectively controllede2
Qualifier
in both the seasone2
Comparator
hand weeding (twice) and unweeded controle3
Setting
FIPPAT Agricultural experimental farm, Padappaie0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValue

Verbatim

e0

“Investigations were carried out for two seasons (July 1998 November 1998 and June 1999 October 1999) at FIPPAT Agricultural experimental farm, Padappai”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–151
e1

“to study the efficiency of three pre-emergence herbicides applied under different tillage systems viz. conventional tillage, conservation tillage and tillage fallow (no-till), for controlling the mixed population of weeds in wet-seeded rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 153–393
e2

“Results revealed that, Oxadiargyl and Pretilachlor application effectively controlled the weeds in both the season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–676
e3

“were applied at 4 DAS, compared with hand weeding (twice) and unweeded control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–560

Title

Effect of tillage and practices and pre-emergence herbicides application for weed control in wet - seeded rice

,Fredrick Inst.. of Plant Protection and Toxicology,Padappai 601 301 Tamil Nadu.; GNANASAMBANDAN S; BALAKRISHNA MURTHY P; et al. Madras Agricultural Journal 2001. doi:10.29321/maj.10.a00379

Other claims from this paper (2)

Record rev-ce136dbd8e1d202d6eb9295b4325edcba77ed39dfb5ebed0434869080c5fec63 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

Pretilachlor · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

150 papers: 147 positive, 3 negative or no effect

146 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

141 papers more in this group

See all 150 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.