Claim · model-written summary
In the non-irrigated treatment, high and medium weed control both gave higher yield than low weed control.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe0 - Treatment
- high and medium WTRTe2
- Outcome
- yielde2
- Direction
- exceedede2
- Qualifier
- in the NI treatmente2
- Comparator
- low WTRTe2
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“yield and net return from soybean grown with no irrigation (NI) or irrigation (I)”
e2“Yields from the high and medium WTRT's in the NI treatment were not different, and both exceeded yield from the low WTRT”
Title
Effect of Irrigation and Weed Control Treatment on Yield and Net Return from Soybean (Glycine max)
Larry G. Heatherly; C. Dennis Elmore; Stan R. Spurlock Weed Technology 1994. doi:10.1017/s0890037x00039221
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Intervention effect Soybean yield declined with decreasing weed control in the irrigated treatment after the first year.
- Intervention effect In the non-irrigated treatment, high and medium weed control gave yields that did not differ.
- Intervention effect Average net returns from medium weed control were greater than from high and low weed control in all years.
- Intervention effect Average net returns from high and medium weed control did not differ.
- Intervention effect Average net returns from high and medium weed control exceeded those from low weed control.
- Intervention effect The yield increase from irrigation declined with decreasing weed control.
- Intervention effect The difference in average net returns between irrigated and non-irrigated soybean declined with decreasing weed control.