Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Annual yields were equal under distributed and withheld irrigation.

A claim from Alfalfa Response to Irrigation from Limited Water Supplies · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Annual yields were equal under distributed and withheld irrigation.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
irrigation was distributed over the growing seasone0
Outcome
Annual yieldse0
Direction
the samee0
Comparator
withheld between the second and third cuttingse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Annual yields were the same when irrigation was distributed over the growing season or withheld between the second and third cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1169
t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7

Title

Alfalfa Response to Irrigation from Limited Water Supplies

Norman L. Klocke; Randall S. Currie; Johnathon D. Holman Transactions of the ASABE 2013. doi:10.13031/trans.56.10166

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-cedd537dddf532dc6dc35b2fe4c51aff3bad7c9101d709c3df2f675995e8af07 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results differ

92 papers: 66 positive, 26 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this claim · 66 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

83 papers more in this group

See all 92 papers →

climate site · yield · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 6 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. no effect
  8. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.