Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Trinexapac-ethyl reduced 1000-grain dry weight in maize.

A claim from Maize Response to Trinexapac-Ethyl and Nitrogen Fertilization · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trinexapac-ethyl reduced 1000-grain dry weight in maize.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Material
P1680 and P30F53e1
Treatment
trinexapac-ethyle5
Outcome
1000-grain dry weighte5
Direction
reducede5
Comparator
without the presence of trinexapac ethyle1
Setting
Lages, Santa Catarina State, South of Brazile1

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5
e1

“The experiment was carried out in Lages, Santa Catarina State, South of Brazil, during two growing seasons with two hybrids (P1680 and P30F53), and four nitrogen rates (0, 150, 300 and 450 kg N ha-1) were tested, with and without the presence of trinexapac ethyl”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 291–553
e5

“The application of trinexapac-ethyl reduced the upper stem internode length, 1000-grain dry weight and did not affect the percentage of lodged plants and grain yield of both hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1311

Title

Maize Response to Trinexapac-Ethyl and Nitrogen Fertilization

L. SANGOI; M.M. DURLI; C.A. SOUZA; et al. Planta Daninha 2020. doi:10.1590/s0100-83582020380100037

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-cf80ee08fd58e8670161438b275ae4d7c173a47ef374323fbee958f6629f22d0 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

trinexapac-ethyl · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.