Paper · 2019 · Semina Ciências Agrárias

Effect of growth regulators and sowing date on the agronomic performance of corn hybrids in the first cropping year

André Prechlak Barbosa; Claudemir Zucareli; José Henrique Bizzarri Bazzo; et al.

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Growth regulators can be an important tool in corn crop management, especially in technology-intensive crops grown in densified spatial arrangements, under favorable environmental conditions, and using genotypes with greater vegetative development. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of growth regulators associated with sowing date on the growth characteristics, yield components, and grain yield of first-crop corn hybrids. The experiment was performed on a 2014/15 field crop, under a randomized complete block design with four replicates. Treatments were placed in a 2 × 2 × 3 factorial arrangement consisting of two sowing dates (first: 09/19/2014 and second: 11/23/2014), two corn hybrids (2B610PW and 2B810PW), and three conditions of growth regulators (control without application, 400 g a.i. ha-1 trinexapac-ethyl, and 200 g a.i. ha-1 clomazone, both applied when six fully expanded leaves were observed). The following characteristics were evaluated: plant height, ear insertion height, stem diameter, leaf area index, number of rows per ear, number of grains per row, number of grains per ear, ear length, ear diameter, prolificacy, thousand grain weight, and grain yield. Corn development and yield performance were altered by the interaction between sowing date, genotypes, and growth regulators. The second sowing date, which was not limited by water deficiency, resulted in better development and yield performance for the two hybrids. The 2B610 hybrid had a higher yield performance than did 2B810 in the second sowing date. Trinexapac-ethyl and clomazone contributed to higher corn grain yield from the two hybrids at the first sowing date and from the 2B810 hybrid at the second date. Trinexapac-ethyl reduced the size of the 2B810 hybrid at the second date. The growth and leaf area of the 2B810 hybrid were less affected by the restrictive conditions of the first sowing date; consequently, there was a higher grain weight performance that did not allow the differentiation of yield between genotypes for this sowing date.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The second sowing date improved development and yield performance of both hybrids.

Treatment
second sowing datee0
Outcome
development and yield performancee0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
first sowing datee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The second sowing date, which was not limited by water deficiency, resulted in better development and yield performance for the two hybrids.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1470 · show in text ↑
t1

“corn hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–88 · show in text ↑
e1

“at the first sowing date and from the 2B810 hybrid at the second date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1652–1721 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2B610 yielded more than 2B810 at the second sowing date.

Material
2B610e0
Outcome
yield performancee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
2B810e0
Setting
second sowing datee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 2B610 hybrid had a higher yield performance than did 2B810 in the second sowing date.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1471–1560 · show in text ↑
t1

“corn hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trinexapac-ethyl raised grain yield for both hybrids at the first sowing date and 2B810 at the second.

Treatment
Trinexapac-ethyle0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
the two hybrids at the first sowing date and from the 2B810 hybrid at the second datee0
Comparator
control without applicatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Trinexapac-ethyl and clomazone contributed to higher corn grain yield from the two hybrids at the first sowing date and from the 2B810 hybrid at the second date.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1561–1722 · show in text ↑
e1

“control without application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–808 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clomazone raised grain yield for both hybrids at the first sowing date and 2B810 at the second.

Treatment
clomazonee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
the two hybrids at the first sowing date and from the 2B810 hybrid at the second datee0
Comparator
control without applicatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Trinexapac-ethyl and clomazone contributed to higher corn grain yield from the two hybrids at the first sowing date and from the 2B810 hybrid at the second date.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1561–1722 · show in text ↑
e1

“control without application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–808 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trinexapac-ethyl reduced 2B810 plant size at the second date.

Material
2B810e0
Treatment
Trinexapac-ethyle0
Outcome
sizee0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
control without applicatione1
Setting
second datee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Trinexapac-ethyl reduced the size of the 2B810 hybrid at the second date.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1723–1796 · show in text ↑
t1

“corn hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–88 · show in text ↑
e1

“control without application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–808 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Restrictive first-date conditions affected 2B810 growth and leaf area less.

Material
2B810e0
Outcome
growth and leaf areae0
Direction
less affectede0
Setting
first sowing datee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The growth and leaf area of the 2B810 hybrid were less affected by the restrictive conditions of the first sowing date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1797–1915 · show in text ↑
t1

“corn hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2B810 had higher grain weight at the first sowing date.

Outcome
grain weight performancee0
Direction
highere0
Setting
this sowing datee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was a higher grain weight performance that did not allow the differentiation of yield between genotypes for this sowing date.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1931–2062 · show in text ↑
t1

“corn hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield did not differ between genotypes at the first sowing date.

Outcome
yield between genotypese0
Direction
did not allow the differentiatione0
Setting
this sowing datee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“did not allow the differentiation of yield between genotypes for this sowing date.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1980–2062 · show in text ↑
t1

“corn hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–88 · show in text ↑

clomazone · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

trinexapac-ethyl · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
    Trinexapac-ethyl reduced 1000-grain dry weight in maize.

    Maize Response to Trinexapac-Ethyl and Nitrogen Fertilization · 2020 · compared with without the presence of trinexapac ethyl

    Opposite direction

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

sowing time · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

269 papers: 178 positive, 91 negative or no effect

177 papers in the same direction as this paper · 89 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

265 papers more in this group

See all 269 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.