Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The second sowing date improved development and yield performance of both hybrids.

A claim from Effect of growth regulators and sowing date on the agronomic performance of corn hybrids in the first cropping year · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The second sowing date improved development and yield performance of both hybrids.

Treatment
second sowing datee0
Outcome
development and yield performancee0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
first sowing datee1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The second sowing date, which was not limited by water deficiency, resulted in better development and yield performance for the two hybrids.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1470
t1

“corn hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–88
e1

“at the first sowing date and from the 2B810 hybrid at the second date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1652–1721

Title

Effect of growth regulators and sowing date on the agronomic performance of corn hybrids in the first cropping year

André Prechlak Barbosa; Claudemir Zucareli; José Henrique Bizzarri Bazzo; et al. Semina Ciências Agrárias 2019. doi:10.5433/1679-0359.2019v40n6supl2p2861

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-6674c630833cbfb65c6df39512617536b4984e64ec555a376c095b2313d74b47 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

sowing time · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

269 papers: 178 positive, 91 negative or no effect

177 papers in the same direction as this claim · 89 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

260 papers more in this group

See all 269 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.