Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Row spacing did not influence broccoli plant height or stem fresh mass.

A claim from SINGLE-HEAD BROCCOLI PRODUCTION UNDER DIFFERENT SPACING AND CONDITIONS OF BAIXADA FLUMINENSE · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Row spacing did not influence broccoli plant height or stem fresh mass.

Treatment
Spacing variationse0
Outcome
PHT and SFMe0
Direction
did not influencee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spacing variations did not influence PHT and SFM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–907
e1

“plant height (PHT), fresh leaf mass (FLM), stem fresh mass (SFM)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–654
t0

“BROCCOLI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–20

Title

SINGLE-HEAD BROCCOLI PRODUCTION UNDER DIFFERENT SPACING AND CONDITIONS OF BAIXADA FLUMINENSE

Taísa Gonçalves Macedo; Carlos Antônio Dos Santos; Antônio de Amorim Brandão; et al. REVISTA DE AGRICULTURA NEOTROPICAL 2022. doi:10.32404/rean.v9i3.6908

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-d077c5c2fd708bc2df74c5eacc8047963fd913779bf6320545193118275335fe · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

density · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 19 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.