Intervention effectmodel-written summary

120 kg N/ha increased protein content, protein yield, oil content, oil yield, net return and B:C ratio over 80 kg N/ha, while remaining at par with 100 kg N/ha.

A claim from Response of nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium on quality parameters and economics analysis of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea (L.) Czern and Coss.) · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

120 kg N/ha increased protein content, protein yield, oil content, oil yield, net return and B:C ratio over 80 kg N/ha, while remaining at par with 100 kg N/ha.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
120 kg N/hae0
Outcome
protein content, protein yield, oil contente0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
at par with 100 kg N/hae0
Comparator
80 kg N/hae0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 120 kg N/ha was recorded significantly higher protein content, protein yield, oil content, oil yield, net return and B: C ratio over 80 kg N/ha however, it was remained at par with 100 kg N/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 316–524
t0

“Indian mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–110

Title

Response of nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium on quality parameters and economics analysis of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea (L.) Czern and Coss.)

Adarsh Sharma; BS Meena; RK Meena; et al. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2020

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-d0995c5e045ec84d31f1a78ad53b4a7a21907216de73d83c3e954bd5df362df3 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · quality: oil · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 10 positive, 5 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.