Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Nano-priming did not affect tomato yield.

A claim from EFFECTS OF TIO2 NANO-PRIMING ON TOMATO SEED GERMINATION AND PLANT DEVELOPMENT · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Taxon: tomatoSolanum lycopersicume1
Treatment: nano-priminge0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: not affectede0
Comparator: hydropriminge2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

*Solanum lycopersicum* · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0
“Although the photosynthesis rate was boosted by nano-priming, the yield was not affected.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1064

e1
“The physiological traits of tomato plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–856

e2
“hydropriming was also used as control”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–813

Title

EFFECTS OF TIO2 NANO-PRIMING ON TOMATO SEED GERMINATION AND PLANT DEVELOPMENT

A.K. Yagiz; M.E. Caliskan The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences 2023. doi:10.36899/japs.2024.1.0695

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect 10 mg L-1 TiO2 nano-priming gave the largest increase in tomato seedling biomass.
Intervention effect TiO2 nano-priming increased chlorophyll content, stomatal conductance and transpiration rate in tomato.
Intervention effect Nano-priming boosted tomato photosynthesis rate.
Intervention effect 10 mg L-1 TiO2 nano-priming increased tomato plant development and chlorophyll content across laboratory and greenhouse conditions.
Observation The priming treatment showed no nanoparticle translocation in the tomato plant.

Record rev-d346b6ccecee1e798862a27f337bbee15fe12102c304254228d367ff65cae445 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

nanoparticle · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

56 papers: 54 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 54 reporting no difference from an alternative

positive
Seed priming with nano ALG/CS-GA 3 increased tomato fruit productivity almost fourfold.
Polymeric nanoparticles as an alternative for application of gibberellic acid in sustainable agriculture: a field study · 2019
No difference from an alternative
positive
SiO2 nanoparticles increased average fruit weight and yield without salt stress.
Form of Silica Improves Yield, Fruit Quality and Antioxidant Defense System of Tomato Plants under Salt Stress · 2020
No difference from an alternative
positive
Cu3(PO4)2·3H2O nanosheets significantly increased tomato fruit yield per plant by over 45.5% relative to the other treatments in the field, in diseased soil.
Copper Nanomaterial Morphology and Composition Control Foliar Transfer through the Cuticle and Mediate Resistance to Root Fungal Disease in Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) · 2020 · compared with the other treatments
No difference from an alternative
positive
T6 produced the highest tomato yield parameter values.
The integrated use of excreta-based vermicompost and inorganic NP fertilizer on tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) fruit yield, quality and soil fertility · 2017
No difference from an alternative
positive
ZnO-NP improved growth, biomass and yield.
Zinc oxide nanoparticles mediated substantial physiological and molecular changes in tomato · 2021
No difference from an alternative
positive
fruit number per plant increased after MnFe2O4 treatment by 50%.
Molecular Mechanisms of Early Flowering in Tomatoes Induced by Manganese Ferrite (MnFe₂O₄) Nanomaterials · 2022
No difference from an alternative
positive
Nano-Fe at 100 mg/kg significantly increased total yield of tomato compared with the other rates.
Nano iron fertilization significantly increases tomato yield by increasing plants’ vegetable growth and photosynthetic efficiency · 2021 · compared with the other rates
No difference from an alternative
positive
A 10 mg dose increased tomato yield by 17%.
Cu Nanoparticles in chitosan-PVA hydrogels as promoters of growth, productivity and fruit quality in tomato · 2017 · compared with control
No difference from an alternative

47 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.

Other papers on the same question

nanoparticle · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results