Paper · 2023 · The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences

EFFECTS OF TIO2 NANO-PRIMING ON TOMATO SEED GERMINATION AND PLANT DEVELOPMENT

A.K. Yagiz; M.E. Caliskan

6
claims
15
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The effect of nano-TiO2 on seed germination and plant development as a priming agent has not been thoroughly studied. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of TiO2 nano-priming on seed germination, plant growth and yield of tomato plants relying on experiments that have been conducted both under laboratory and greenhouse conditions. During the laboratory experiments, the seed germination, seed vigor index and water uptake of seeds were determined after 5, 10, 50 and 100 mg L-1 of TiO2 nano-priming while hydropriming was used as control. The biomass of tomato seedling was increased the most for the 10 mg L-1 TiO2 nano-priming condition. With follow-up experiments, the effect of 10 mg L-1 TiO2 nano-priming was investigated further under greenhouse conditions, where hydropriming was also used as control. The physiological traits of tomato plants, like chlorophyll content, stomatal conductance and transpiration rate were increased by TiO2 nano-priming treatment. Although the photosynthesis rate was boosted by nano-priming, the yield was not affected. The application of 10 mg L-1 TiO2 as nano-priming agent increased plant development and chlorophyll content under both laboratory and greenhouse conditions without translocation in the plant, which is one of the most important concerts of using nanoparticles in plant production. Key words: Nano-priming, priming, TiO2, tomato, seed

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

10 mg L-1 TiO2 nano-priming gave the largest increase in tomato seedling biomass.

Treatment
10 mg L-1 TiO2 nano-priminge0
Outcome
biomass of tomato seedlinge0
Direction
increased the moste0
Comparator
hydropriminge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The biomass of tomato seedling was increased the most for the 10 mg L-1 TiO2 nano-priming condition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–645 · show in text ↑
e1

“hydropriming was used as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–543 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TiO2 nano-priming increased chlorophyll content, stomatal conductance and transpiration rate in tomato.

Treatment
TiO2 nano-priming treatmente0
Outcome
chlorophyll content, stomatal conductance and transpiration ratee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
hydropriminge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The physiological traits of tomato plants, like chlorophyll content, stomatal conductance and transpiration rate were increased by TiO2 nano-priming treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–974 · show in text ↑
e1

“hydropriming was also used as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–813 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano-priming boosted tomato photosynthesis rate.

Treatment
nano-priminge0
Outcome
photosynthesis ratee0
Direction
boostede0
Comparator
hydropriminge2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Although the photosynthesis rate was boosted by nano-priming, the yield was not affected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1064 · show in text ↑
e1

“The physiological traits of tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–856 · show in text ↑
e2

“hydropriming was also used as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–813 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano-priming did not affect tomato yield.

Treatment
nano-priminge0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
not affectede0
Comparator
hydropriminge2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Although the photosynthesis rate was boosted by nano-priming, the yield was not affected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1064 · show in text ↑
e1

“The physiological traits of tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–856 · show in text ↑
e2

“hydropriming was also used as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–813 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

10 mg L-1 TiO2 nano-priming increased tomato plant development and chlorophyll content across laboratory and greenhouse conditions.

Treatment
10 mg L-1 TiO2 as nano-priming agente0
Outcome
plant development and chlorophyll contente0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
hydropriminge1
Setting
laboratory and greenhouse conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of 10 mg L-1 TiO2 as nano-priming agent increased plant development and chlorophyll content under both laboratory and greenhouse conditions without translocation in the plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1255 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–38 · show in text ↑
e1

“hydropriming was also used as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–813 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The priming treatment showed no nanoparticle translocation in the tomato plant.

Outcome
without translocation in the plante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“without translocation in the plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1255 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–38 · show in text ↑

titanium dioxide · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

titanium dioxide · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 31 positive, 1 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

56 papers: 54 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 54 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

100 papers: 94 positive, 6 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

96 papers more in this group

See all 100 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: gas exchange · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: photosynthesis · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

25 papers: 25 positive, 0 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.