Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Biogas slurry did not significantly control aphid occurrence.

A claim from Impact of Spraying Biogas Slurry for on the Population Dynamics of Aphid with Xinluzao 13 of Cotton in Xinjiang · 2009

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biogas slurry did not significantly control aphid occurrence.

Treatment
Spraying biogas slurrye0
Interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
Outcome
occurrence of aphidse0
Direction
could not significantly controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spraying biogas slurry could not significantly control the occurrence of aphids.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–541
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–99

Title

Impact of Spraying Biogas Slurry for on the Population Dynamics of Aphid with Xinluzao 13 of Cotton in Xinjiang

Zhang Pei-ling Journal of Xinjiang Agricultural University 2009

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-d51142c814bc9d0ff7680a8ffec71dda6dca919f19e96995d165d0609e88182f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

fertilization · Aphidomorpha · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

application · Aphidomorpha · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. negative
See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.