Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Effect of Site Specific Nutrient Management for Targeted Yields on Population Dynamics of Sucking Pests in Bt-Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)

Vinayak Hosamani; B.M. Chittapur; Mallik arjun; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

The field experiment on cotton productivity and leaf reddening as influenced by nutrition management for targeted yield was conducted during growing seasons of 2014-15 and 2015-16 at College of Agriculture Farm, Raichur, Karnataka on medium deep black soil under irrigation. Three yield targets (3, 4 and 5 t kapas yield ha-1) based site specific nutrient management (SSNM) along with four leaf reddening management (LRM) treatments (S1 - Vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha-1 in seed line, S2 - S1 + MgSO4 10 kg ha-1 in seed line, S3 - S1 + MgSO4 25 kg ha-1 in seed line, and S4 - MgSO4 25 kg ha-1 in seed line + foliar nutrition of 1% MgSO4 +19:19:19 + 1% KNO3 trice during flowering, boll development and boll bursting stages) besides recommended control were tested using RCBD. SSNM for 5 t ha-1 yield target and supplementary nutrition of MgSO4 both to soil and to foliage and foliar application of major nutrients (19:19:19 and KNO3) (S4) recorded significantly higher aphids count throughout (3.69, 5.42, 2.87 and 3.3), hopper count (10.7, 15.3, 17.5 and 13.1) and thrips count throughout (14.0, 17.8, 21.1 and 16.6 at 30, 45, 60 and 90 DAS, respectively on pooled basis). The dynamics population was lower with medium to lower yield targets; latter (M1) had lower count among all on pooled basis.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 5 t ha-1 SSNM target with S4 had significantly higher aphid counts across sampling times.

Taxon
Bt-Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Gossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
SSNM for 5 t ha-1 yield target and supplementary nutrition of MgSO4 both to soil and to foliage and foliar application of major nutrients (19:19:19 and KNO3) (S4)e0
Interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
Outcome
aphids count throughoute0
Direction
significantly highere0
Value
3.69, 5.42, 2.87 and 3.3e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bt-Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–140 · show in text ↑
e0

“SSNM for 5 t ha-1 yield target and supplementary nutrition of MgSO4 both to soil and to foliage and foliar application of major nutrients (19:19:19 and KNO3) (S4) recorded significantly higher aphids count throughout (3.69, 5.42, 2.87 and 3.3), hopper count (10.7, 15.3, 17.5 and 13.1) and thrips count throughout (14.0, 17.8, 21.1 and 16.6 at 30, 45, 60 and 90 DAS, respectively on pooled basis).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–1167 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 5 t ha-1 SSNM target with S4 had significantly higher hopper counts across sampling times.

Taxon
Bt-Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Gossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
SSNM for 5 t ha-1 yield target and supplementary nutrition of MgSO4 both to soil and to foliage and foliar application of major nutrients (19:19:19 and KNO3) (S4)e0
Interactor
hoppere0pest
Outcome
hopper counte0
Direction
significantly highere0
Value
10.7, 15.3, 17.5 and 13.1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bt-Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–140 · show in text ↑
e0

“SSNM for 5 t ha-1 yield target and supplementary nutrition of MgSO4 both to soil and to foliage and foliar application of major nutrients (19:19:19 and KNO3) (S4) recorded significantly higher aphids count throughout (3.69, 5.42, 2.87 and 3.3), hopper count (10.7, 15.3, 17.5 and 13.1) and thrips count throughout (14.0, 17.8, 21.1 and 16.6 at 30, 45, 60 and 90 DAS, respectively on pooled basis).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–1167 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 5 t ha-1 SSNM target with S4 had significantly higher thrips counts across sampling times.

Taxon
Bt-Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Gossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
SSNM for 5 t ha-1 yield target and supplementary nutrition of MgSO4 both to soil and to foliage and foliar application of major nutrients (19:19:19 and KNO3) (S4)e0
Interactor
thripsThripse0pest
Outcome
thrips count throughoute0
Direction
significantly highere0
Value
14.0, 17.8, 21.1 and 16.6e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thrips
Thrips · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bt-Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–140 · show in text ↑
e0

“SSNM for 5 t ha-1 yield target and supplementary nutrition of MgSO4 both to soil and to foliage and foliar application of major nutrients (19:19:19 and KNO3) (S4) recorded significantly higher aphids count throughout (3.69, 5.42, 2.87 and 3.3), hopper count (10.7, 15.3, 17.5 and 13.1) and thrips count throughout (14.0, 17.8, 21.1 and 16.6 at 30, 45, 60 and 90 DAS, respectively on pooled basis).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–1167 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pest population dynamics were lower with medium and lower yield targets, with the lower target M1 lowest on a pooled basis.

Taxon
Bt-Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Gossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
medium to lower yield targetse0
Outcome
dynamics populatione0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
latter (M1) had lower count among all on pooled basise0

Not reportedMaterial

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bt-Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–140 · show in text ↑
e0

“The dynamics population was lower with medium to lower yield targets; latter (M1) had lower count among all on pooled basis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1168–1292 · show in text ↑

fertilization · Thrips · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · Aphidomorpha · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

climate site · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

application · Thrips · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

application · Aphidomorpha · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

fertilization · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 15 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

application · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 36 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

climate site · Thrips · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.