Paper · 2002 · Compost Science & Utilization

Effects of Surface Application of MSW Compost On Cotton Production – Soil Properties, Plant Responses, And Nematode Management

A. Khalilian; M. J. Sullivan; J.D. Mueller; et al.

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
12
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Equipment was modified and/or developed for broadcast and banded applications of municipal solid waste (MSW) compost at selected rates to agricultural land for cotton production. Replicated tests were conducted for four years to determine the effects of compost on soil properties, crop yield, and nematode populations. Soil type in the test field was Faceville loamy sand. Broadcast application of compost significantly reduced soil compaction in the top 30 cm of soil in cotton rows and row-middles compared to no compost application. Banded application did not affect compaction in the row middles. Columbia lance nematode densities decreased in all compost-treated plots during all four years of study. Several plots treated with compost had nematode densities comparable to those found in the plots treated with Temik 15G nematicide. Compost application significantly increased the soil organic matter content and soil nitrogen content at six and 14 weeks after planting. However, the compost did not affect the leaf nitrogen content of the cotton plant during the same sampling periods. In 1996, 1997, and 1998, all rates of added compost significantly increased seed cotton yield. Yield increase was proportional to application rate. There were very few carry-over compost effects from each previous year's treatments on either soil organic matter, soil nitrogen, or seed cotton yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Broadcast application of compost significantly reduced soil compaction in cotton rows and row-middles compared with no compost application.

Treatment
Broadcast application of composte0
Outcome
soil compactione0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
no compost applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Broadcast application of compost significantly reduced soil compaction in the top 30 cm of soil in cotton rows and row-middles compared to no compost application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–535 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Banded application of compost did not affect soil compaction in the cotton row middles.

Treatment
Banded applicatione1
Outcome
compactione1
Direction
did not affecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–66 · show in text ↑
e1

“Banded application did not affect compaction in the row middles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–600 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost decreased Columbia lance nematode densities in all compost-treated plots during all four years of study.

Treatment
composte2
Interactor
Columbia lance nematodee2pest
Outcome
Columbia lance nematode densitiese2
Direction
decreasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–66 · show in text ↑
e2

“Columbia lance nematode densities decreased in all compost-treated plots during all four years of study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–705 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Several compost-treated plots had nematode densities comparable to those in plots treated with Temik 15G nematicide.

Treatment
composte3
Interactor
nematodeNematodae3pest
Outcome
nematode densitiese3
Direction
comparablee3
Comparator
Temik 15G nematicidee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–66 · show in text ↑
e3

“Several plots treated with compost had nematode densities comparable to those found in the plots treated with Temik 15G nematicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–837 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost application significantly increased soil organic matter content and soil nitrogen content at six and 14 weeks after planting.

Treatment
Compost applicatione4
Outcome
soil organic matter content and soil nitrogen contente4
Direction
increasede4
Qualifier
at six and 14 weeks after plantinge4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–66 · show in text ↑
e4

“Compost application significantly increased the soil organic matter content and soil nitrogen content at six and 14 weeks after planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–975 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost did not affect leaf nitrogen content of the cotton plant during the same sampling periods.

Organ / stage
leafe5
Treatment
composte5
Outcome
leaf nitrogen contente5
Direction
did not affecte5
Qualifier
during the same sampling periodse5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“the compost did not affect the leaf nitrogen content of the cotton plant during the same sampling periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1091 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All rates of added compost significantly increased seed cotton yield in 1996, 1997 and 1998.

Treatment
all rates of added composte6
Outcome
seed cotton yielde6
Direction
increasede6
Qualifier
In 1996, 1997, and 1998e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–66 · show in text ↑
e6

“In 1996, 1997, and 1998, all rates of added compost significantly increased seed cotton yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1186 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton yield increase was proportional to the compost application rate.

Treatment
application ratee7
Outcome
Yield increasee7
Direction
increasee7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–66 · show in text ↑
e7

“Yield increase was proportional to application rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1239 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carry-over effects of compost from previous years were very few on soil organic matter, soil nitrogen and seed cotton yield.

Outcome
carry-over compost effectse7
Qualifier
very fewe7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–66 · show in text ↑
e7

“There were very few carry-over compost effects from each previous year's treatments on either soil organic matter, soil nitrogen, or seed cotton yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1391 · show in text ↑

fertilization · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 15 positive, 5 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

131 papers: 121 positive, 10 negative or no effect

120 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

127 papers more in this group

See all 131 papers →

fertilization · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 497 positive, 53 negative or no effect

496 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

fertilization · Nematoda · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · soil: physics · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.