Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The 5 t ha-1 SSNM target with S4 had significantly higher thrips counts across sampling times.

A claim from Effect of Site Specific Nutrient Management for Targeted Yields on Population Dynamics of Sucking Pests in Bt-Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 5 t ha-1 SSNM target with S4 had significantly higher thrips counts across sampling times.

Taxon
Bt-Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Gossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
SSNM for 5 t ha-1 yield target and supplementary nutrition of MgSO4 both to soil and to foliage and foliar application of major nutrients (19:19:19 and KNO3) (S4)e0
Interactor
thripsThripse0pest
Outcome
thrips count throughoute0
Direction
significantly highere0
Value
14.0, 17.8, 21.1 and 16.6e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thrips
Thrips · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bt-Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–140
e0

“SSNM for 5 t ha-1 yield target and supplementary nutrition of MgSO4 both to soil and to foliage and foliar application of major nutrients (19:19:19 and KNO3) (S4) recorded significantly higher aphids count throughout (3.69, 5.42, 2.87 and 3.3), hopper count (10.7, 15.3, 17.5 and 13.1) and thrips count throughout (14.0, 17.8, 21.1 and 16.6 at 30, 45, 60 and 90 DAS, respectively on pooled basis).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–1167

Title

Effect of Site Specific Nutrient Management for Targeted Yields on Population Dynamics of Sucking Pests in Bt-Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)

Vinayak Hosamani; B.M. Chittapur; Mallik arjun; et al. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2018. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2018.708.423

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-e22ce02805ec18ab3775ffcc1163f6286aa1d7c8b7a9c1072850191ddc915406 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

fertilization · Thrips · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

application · Thrips · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. no effect
See all 6 papers →

climate site · Thrips · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.